1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Gary Thorne: It was paint on Schilling's sock in Game 6 of the LCS, not blood

Discussion in 'Sports and News' started by ondeadline, Apr 26, 2007.

  1. ondeadline

    ondeadline Well-Known Member

    Curt would make something up??

     
  2. Re: Gary Thorne: It was paint on Schilling's sock, not blood

    This will not end quietly.
     
  3. bostonbred

    bostonbred Guest

    Re: Gary Thorne: It was paint on Schilling's sock, not blood

    It was apparently a joke by Mirabelli, taken too seriously by Thorne. Who would be foolish enough to paint a bloody sock? The truth would have leaked by now anyway.
     
  4. ondeadline

    ondeadline Well-Known Member

    Re: Gary Thorne: It was paint on Schilling's sock, not blood

    I'd just like to put give Mirabelli and Schilling lie-detector tests. Thorne's a solid guy and I can't think of a reason why he'd make that up. Perhaps Mirabelli said it, but was kidding?
     
  5. ondeadline

    ondeadline Well-Known Member

    Re: Gary Thorne: It was paint on Schilling's sock, not blood

    Then why did Mirabelli not admit that he was joking about this. Or has he?
     
  6. bostonbred

    bostonbred Guest

    Re: Gary Thorne: It was paint on Schilling's sock, not blood

    He denied he said this at all and according to the quote, is very pissed about his name being used with such a bold statement. I'm just guessing he cracked a joke a few years back and doesn't even remember.

    If it was paint on the sock, we'd have found out before 2007. Shaungnessy would have been licking his chops, eager to expose Schilling and get some pub.
     
  7. ondeadline

    ondeadline Well-Known Member

    Re: Gary Thorne: It was paint on Schilling's sock, not blood

    Until either Thorne says Mirabelli might have been joking OR Mirabelli admits he said it but adds that he was joking OR somebody admits that it was paint, there will be questions.
     
  8. Simon_Cowbell

    Simon_Cowbell Active Member

    Re: Gary Thorne: It was paint on Schilling's sock, not blood

    I believe Gary Thorne, and his bullshit detector.
     
  9. outofplace

    outofplace Well-Known Member

    Re: Gary Thorne: It was paint on Schilling's sock, not blood

    Sometimes our willingness to back other members of the media on this site no matter what amazes me.
     
  10. Pastor

    Pastor Active Member

    Re: Gary Thorne: It was paint on Schilling's sock, not blood


    Thanks for the impartial fanboy response.


    Isn't the sock in Cooperstown? If so, could it come to a head where they actually test the thing? Hell, we could send David Caruso up there.
     
  11. ondeadline

    ondeadline Well-Known Member

    Re: Gary Thorne: It was paint on Schilling's sock, not blood

    So, is that your way of saying Thorne made it up?
     
  12. Simon_Cowbell

    Simon_Cowbell Active Member

    Re: Gary Thorne: It was paint on Schilling's sock, not blood

    Gary Thorne is a lawyer most definitely NOT with a proclivity for on-air bombast. I have been listening to the guy regularly for almost 25 years.

    If he said it, Mirabelli said it.

    Mirabelli MAY have been joking.

    But there is no way "he didn't say it."
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page