Free speech? Not with the "Rally Squads" around

If there were Clinton materials, or politicized IRS audits, the info would have been leaked by Starr's office or bu the GOP congressional investigators. Since they weren't, I doubt their provenance.

 

As a longtime independent and a moralist skeptic, I'm caught in the middle and appalled by both sides.

I'm especially disgusted by the Busher administration, but adding to the misery is the thought that if Clinton had just made it a point to keep his pants pulled up on the job, how the world might be smiling upon us to this day.

Have at it.

 

That's all well and good if you want every appearance by your president (doesn't matter which party) to be a shouting match between protesters and supporters. If that's the way you want it, then why would a president even bother to speak in public again?

Presidential appearances are one of two things: Either a fund-raising event for someone or something; or an appearance set up for him to speak in favor of some kind of organization or project or something else.

But if you want to presidential appearances to simply be chances for idiots of either side to shout him down, then what's the point? And, no, this is not a free speech issue. Idiots have the right to say what they want on street corners, but not in events organized as fund raisers and such.

 

There are so many easy shots to be taken here, but I'll resist.

The simple fact that Bubble-Boy's supporters are left to stoop to this sordid level of fantasy/denial speaks volumes.

 

Bingo! That is exactly the point. Protesters on the left are always acting like 2-year-olds.

 

Old Tony seems to have a problem with the concept of freedom of assembly and freedom of speech.

And Ben is right. It's like shooting fish in a barrel with Tony.

It's inches from fascism.

 

And the Quebec Police at the recent summit in Montebello used "agents provocateurs"

http://www.thestar.com/News/Canada/article/249291

With the proof caught on video, Quebec provincial police were forced to admit Thursday that three undercover agents were playing the part of protestors at this week’s international summit in Montebello, Que.

 

And yet you always miss anyway. How bad can you be. Try to use "freedom of assembly" when you insist they let you into a ballgame or hockey game without a ticket. Sportst teams also have their security guards take signs and banners from fans that offend the team's sensibilities.

But keep trying, junior.

 

Wow, the dumbassery continues.

Yeah, because a public (hello, public) event by a politician is comparable to going to a baseball game, hockey game, opera, theatre, movie.

You don't have a clue what "freedom of assembly" means.

Or democracy for that matter.

Jesus, you're almost dumber than Yawn.