Ethical quandary @ WaPo: Story spiked

Perry White · Jan 15, 2008

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/discussion/2008/01/09/DI2008010900720.html

The situation:

The Post sends a reporter to attend a three-day seminar in seduction, in which men are taught how to pick up women and get them into bed. The company giving these courses, "The Mystery Method," knew a Post reporter was in attendance; the reporter paid the same admission fee as everyone else. Courses by the Mystery Method and its competitors are becoming big business in the United States.

Like all Mystery Method instructors, the teacher of this seminar uses only a nickname. He calls himself "The Don."

To protect the privacy of the men taking the course, The Post agrees to refer to them only by nicknames in the story.

The course was eye-popping for its casual misogyny: The routine way that women are unabashedly sorted by looks alone, pursued methodically through a learned set of rules and phony pickup lines, and seen as targets in what is, essentially, a process of conquest.

The reporter writes the story, filled with anecdotes from the three-day seminar. It is a complex story, but, on balance, is sharply critical of the methods used.

An editor tells the reporter he must identify The Don's real name. The Don refuses, saying that he doesn't want his life as a pickup artist to be known to friends, relatives, prospective employers. Moreover, he says, he would never have agreed to allow a reporter in the room if he believed his real name would be used. And that's the problem: Against Post policy, the reporter had implicitly agreed to this without first consulting with his editors.

The conflict cannot be resolved: The Post kills the story.
Click to expand...

The writer's reaction:

This was the cover story I'd been working on for two months. It will never see print, and although I disagree with that decision, I understand it and have only myself to blame. Biggest mistake in professional judgment I've ever made. (I've made bigger mistakes in PERSONAL judgment, and I can't write about those, either.)

When you work for The Washington Post, every once in a while you are reminded of what a towering institution it is, and how, by and large, its decisions are propelled primarily by a sense of integrity. Sounds sappy, but it's true.

At every stage of figuring out how to deal with this mess, the easy and expedient thing to have done would have been to publish this story. In all likelihood, no one would have complained; it is an absolutely fascinating story (sob); and to publish it simply would have entailed making a minor shift in institutional thinking via the application of some slightly squishy situational ethics.

The fact is, the editors felt that it was essential that we not appear to let The Don hide behind a facade, and ordered me to name him. The fact is, I could not recall exactly what I had told The Don about whether his name would be used, but inasmuch I had never really intended to use it, I probably conveyed that in ways he had a right to rely on. Though I tried to wiggle around that in my own mind, I couldn't sell it to myself.

I do think the Post's decision was wrong, and had I taken the poll I would have picked options 6 and 7. The thing that most surprises me is that so many of you did the same; from opnions of readers expressed elswhere, I expected more of a consensus that anonymity is bad, period.

I feel deflated, disappointed, embarrassed, but not angry. The precipitating error was mine alone. The Post is trying very hard to tighten its rules on granting anonymity, and I should have known better than to have casually dispensed it.
Click to expand...

playthrough · Jan 15, 2008

Hmm. Who paid more, the Wash Post for the three-day seduction seminar or the NYPost for planting the Jessica Simpson lookalike in Dallas?

Sadly, the far better story didn't make it to print.

Flying Headbutt · Jan 15, 2008

Does this mean the Post will no longer let campaign aides who rip into other campaigns do so with anonymity?

I bet not.

Ace · Jan 15, 2008

There does seem to be a double standard, but the reporters should have manned up from the start and been prepared to use the dude's real name.

bigpern23 · Jan 15, 2008

What amazes me is this has gone from crappy VH1 reality show to a full-fledged business.

Can't anyone get laid without help anymore?

Chi City 81 · Jan 15, 2008

bigpern23 said:

What amazes me is this has gone from crappy VH1 reality show to a full-fledged business.

Can't anyone get laid without help anymore?
Click to expand...

No.

Pilot · Jan 15, 2008

bigpern23 said:

What amazes me is this has gone from crappy VH1 reality show to a full-fledged business.

Can't anyone get laid without help anymore?
Click to expand...

4,581 posts ... you don't seem new here. Are you using a friend's account or something?

old_tony · Jan 15, 2008

The Good Doctor said:

bigpern23 said:

What amazes me is this has gone from crappy VH1 reality show to a full-fledged business.

Can't anyone get laid without help anymore?
Click to expand...

No.
Click to expand...

Ouch, Doc. That was cold. Good shot.

p.s. Sorry Mike.

friend of a friend · Jan 15, 2008

The Good Doctor said:

bigpern23 said:

What amazes me is this has gone from crappy VH1 reality show to a full-fledged business.

Can't anyone get laid without help anymore?
Click to expand...

No.
Click to expand...

Awesome

TheSportsPredictor · Dec 15, 2014

Just read this book if you want the story:

Chi City 81 · Jan 15, 2008

Unavailable for comment:

GB-Hack · Dec 15, 2014

TheSportsPredictor said:

Just read this book if you want the story:

Click to expand...

I keep seeing adverts for this thing on MyspaceTV when I'm over there.

Log in or Sign up

Ethical quandary @ WaPo: Story spiked

Perry White Active Member

playthrough Moderator Staff Member

Flying Headbutt Moderator Staff Member

Ace Well-Known Member

bigpern23 Well-Known Member

Chi City 81 Guest

Pilot Well-Known Member

old_tony Well-Known Member

friend of a friend Guest

TheSportsPredictor Well-Known Member

Chi City 81 Guest

GB-Hack Active Member

Share This Page

Log in or Sign up

Ethical quandary @ WaPo: Story spiked

Perry White Active Member

playthrough Moderator Staff Member

Flying Headbutt Moderator Staff Member

Ace Well-Known Member

bigpern23 Well-Known Member

Chi City 81 Guest

Pilot Well-Known Member

old_tony Well-Known Member

friend of a friend Guest

TheSportsPredictor Well-Known Member

Chi City 81 Guest

GB-Hack Active Member

Share This Page

Useful Searches