1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

'Eight Stupidest Things Sports Fans Love to Say'

Discussion in 'Anything goes' started by Dick Whitman, Aug 2, 2010.

  1. Flying Headbutt

    Flying Headbutt Moderator Staff Member

    Consistently subjective is different than doing something objectively consistent. You judge whether something is a strike. You can't judge whether a ball goes through a hoop. Either it does or it doesn't.
     
  2. Buck

    Buck Well-Known Member

    If the ump is consistent, the players can adjust.
    That's the point.
     
  3. JR

    JR Well-Known Member

    Oh, please, get over yourself.

    I'm saying that people in glass houses shouldn't throw stones.

    For every dumb fanboi statement, I can provide an example from the media, print or electronic.
     
  4. Shaggy

    Shaggy Guest

    High school basketball parents are THE WORST at this.
     
  5. Shaggy

    Shaggy Guest

    The professional sports message boards always have great trade ideas. And they're not at all slanted heavily toward the team they root for.

    "Why don't we send John Q. Shittyplayer and Jack Cantfuckinghit to the Cardinals for Albert Pujols and a prospect? Think about it--we need a 1B and the Cardinals have Holliday to anchor the lineup already."
     
  6. micropolitan guy

    micropolitan guy Well-Known Member

    Yes, but such consistency isn't an attribute, as it is often made out to be in umpiring.


    The players could adjust if the first-base ump called players who were out by a step safe every time. But the umpire would still be wrong, and a shitty ump.

    The strike zone is somewhat clearly defined in that the ball has to go over the plate at some point to be considered a strike. Umpires who consistently call strikes on pitches that do not go over the plate at any point are consistently making the wrong call, and are bad balls and strikes umpires.
     
  7. Piotr Rasputin

    Piotr Rasputin New Member

    So . . . both, then.
     
  8. Buck

    Buck Well-Known Member

    I'm not saying it makes the person a good umpire.
    I'm saying what you are mistaking for praise is simply understanding the situation could be worse.
     
  9. BB Bobcat

    BB Bobcat Active Member

    "It's easier to score a 3 on a Par 5 than on a Par 4."
     
  10. dooley_womack1

    dooley_womack1 Well-Known Member

    "Hey, ref, he pulled his trunks!"
     
  11. micropolitan guy

    micropolitan guy Well-Known Member

    I can live with that.

    Because some thing worse could always be Eric Gregg or Joe West (who is actually a good ump, just an insufferable egomaniac).
     
  12. joe_schmoe

    joe_schmoe Active Member

    Friend of mine knew he was never going to be a big league ump when he was at a Pony League game once, and a dad/assistant coach, who already had a bad rep, had been ragging on him most of the game.

    Late in a game Joe calls pitch one a ball, then pitch two he calls a strike when the dad's kid is at the plate. Dad gives the standard "Come on Joe, that pitch was the same spot as the last one."
    So Joe turns and yells back "You know what, you're right." Turned to scorekeeper and yelled "Make the count 0-2. Playball."

    Dad was dumbfounded. Joe never umped again, but the opposing team got a big kick out of it.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page