1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Dowd on accuracy in "historical" films

Discussion in 'Sports and News' started by BenPoquette, Feb 17, 2013.

  1. hondo

    hondo Well-Known Member

    Well, that too. Truth be told, any western made between 1920 and 1970 that has any kind of historical backdrop is probably much more inaccurate that Zero Dark Thirty.
     
  2. Drip

    Drip Active Member

    Remember, It's only a movie. It's only a movie. It's only a movie.
     
  3. TrooperBari

    TrooperBari Well-Known Member

    Braveheart: Pretty much all of it.

    http://medievalscotland.org/scotbiblio/braveheart.shtml
    http://www.scottishhistory.com/articles/independence/braveheart.html
     
  4. Tarheel316

    Tarheel316 Well-Known Member

    Willing suspension of disbelief.
     
  5. Shoeless Joe

    Shoeless Joe Active Member

    Awwwwww, come on. There was a man named William Wallace, and there are countries called England and Scotland. Beyond that, you've got me.
     
  6. Baron Scicluna

    Baron Scicluna Well-Known Member

    Flash Gordon never played for the Jets either.
     
  7. Double Down

    Double Down Well-Known Member

    By the way, Mississippi finally abolished slavery this week. And we owe it all to the film (and a doctor who was like WTF?). For reals.

    http://www.clarionledger.com/article/20130217/NEWS01/302170050/Historic-oversight-corrected-Film-Lincoln-inspires-look-into-slavery-vote?nclick_check=1
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page