Dick's 1994 view on Iraq

Not to take this thread totally off-topic, but when will pro-life folks realize that they're being played like drums by the Republicans on this issue? You had all three branches of government on your side last year, and what came of it? A partial-birth bill? Nothing else? The Republican political machine has no interest whatsoever in repealing Roe or banning abortion; it would deprive them of their best wedge issue.

 

Um, that's 2 branches, Roe won't be overturned anytime soon, and that is not at all where the battle is now. I didn't say it's a human life, read more carefully please.

 

So by "unborn life" you meant animals then? And what wasn't conservative in your mind in 2006, the Bush administration, the Republican Congress or the Roberts SCOTUS?

 

So it's "unborn life," but not "human life"?
What's the problem, then?
If it's not human, why not flush it?

 

The Roberts SCOTUS, and I think it's a fetus, on its way to becoming human, which is less than human but more than trash.

 

so, to rephrase: any neocons have any thoughts on dick's POV in 1994?

 

Are there even any neo-cons on this board?

 

I think Yawn is Bill Kristol.

 

The answer to that, unfortunately, was listed previously.

What's a neocon? :

 

Probably not in the strict sense of the term. Bush loyalists/apologists aren't necessarily neo-cons. Babbling "9/11 changed everything!" as a response to all criticism isn't the same as citing Laurie Mylroie chapter and verse.

 

are you stupid?

 

If believing that neo-con has a definition other than "Republicans who Tom disagrees with," makes me stupid, then I am the dumbest fucker ever to walk the face of the earth.