1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Dicey situation for Orenthal? Simpson questioned in casino robbery

Discussion in 'Sports and News' started by ondeadline, Sep 14, 2007.

  1. old_tony

    old_tony Well-Known Member

    A white Bronco was seen pulling up in front of the casino.
     
  2. ondeadline

    ondeadline Well-Known Member

    Bumping the original thread that seems to have gotten lost and (more importantly) it's not locked.
     
  3. Ace

    Ace Well-Known Member

    Bottom line, if you've got something of OJ's he wants it back.
     
  4. Claws for Concern

    Claws for Concern Active Member

    He might cut you some slack if you give him what he wants.
     
  5. Rufino

    Rufino Active Member

    He apparently wasn't staying there. God only knows why anyone else would be either.
     
  6. Jesus_Muscatel

    Jesus_Muscatel Well-Known Member

    He might even go for a Colombian necktie.
     
  7. boots

    boots New Member

    Don't need Johnny. The Juice is on the loose.
     
  8. Blame the LAPD and Lt. Stupid and his partner, Detective Goebbels.
     
  9. wickedwritah

    wickedwritah Guest

    The prosecution deserves a big deal of the blame.

    Clark and Darden were too busy slapping skins to counteract any strategy Cochran, et al, put together.
     
  10. Smallpotatoes

    Smallpotatoes Well-Known Member

    What about Judge Ito? Couldn't he have done a better job moving things along?
     
  11. The Big Ragu

    The Big Ragu Moderator Staff Member

    The jury that acquitted in the face of DNA evidence had a small impact on the verdict.
     
  12. Smallpotatoes

    Smallpotatoes Well-Known Member

    The verdict doesn't bother me as much as the ridiculous length of the trial. I don't blame the jury for not deliberating longer than it did. Nobody should have to put their lives on hold for nine months like they did. There came a point where getting it over with was just as important as getting it right. Too many sidebars, six months before the trial even begins just to hash out the ground rules. Justice would not have been sacrificed by a shorter, quicker trial. Obviously, everything taking as long as it did, didn't help anything, either.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page