1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Dems' latest oil answer: Speed limits

Discussion in 'Sports and News' started by HackyMcHack, Jul 25, 2008.

  1. HackyMcHack

    HackyMcHack Member

  2. Pastor

    Pastor Active Member

    Driving slower reduces the amount of fuel consumed. Since driving is a privilege and not a right, I don't see a problem with this.

    Why are you whining?
  3. Diabeetus

    Diabeetus Active Member

    Also reduces the number of fatal accidents.
  4. jgmacg

    jgmacg Guest

    Nixon nannied us into it the first time. 1974. Sorry, Hacky.
  5. cranberry

    cranberry Well-Known Member

    Nice try, though. Feel free to come back and give it another shot when you have your facts straight.
  6. Ace

    Ace Well-Known Member

    You can slow me down when you pry my cold, dead foot off the accelerator!
  7. 2muchcoffeeman

    2muchcoffeeman Active Member

    Which occasionally is literally the truth.
  8. JR

    JR Well-Known Member

    Well, at least he didn't say Democrat Party.
  9. spnited

    spnited Active Member

    Does anyone actually drive 65 or slower on an open highway?
  10. forever_town

    forever_town Well-Known Member

    Who brought Chef into the conversation?
  11. Baron Scicluna

    Baron Scicluna Well-Known Member

    Sure, Japanese women. {John Rocker}
  12. PopeDirkBenedict

    PopeDirkBenedict Active Member


    The move from 55 to 65 actually reduced fatal accidents per capita.

    The only winners under this plan would be state highway patrol officers.
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page