1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Demand Studios

Discussion in 'Journalism topics only' started by goalmouth, Nov 20, 2009.

  1. SF_Express

    SF_Express Active Member

    I had a friend who didn't submit a resume on the first go-round ... and because of that, that was all she wrote. Maybe give it a little time and try again using a different e-mail address.

    To anybody thinking of doing this, a word of advice: Follow their instructions to the letter. Doing something like the no-resume person did will get you knocked out in a hurry.

    On a side note:

    http://www.poynter.org/column.asp?id=31&aid=173972

    They're right -- it's NOT real journalism. But the money still spends.
     
  2. deskslave

    deskslave Active Member

    No idea what the criteria are. It's not as though I consider myself the best editor in the world, but I am pretty good, and I've done it professionally for quite a few years. And I didn't make the cut, apparently.

    I have written a couple things for them; they do pay promptly, or at least they did. But yeah, a lot of the 'How To' ones are ridiculous. They look like someone just picked out 100 random Google searches and turned them into story ideas.
     
  3. txsportsscribe

    txsportsscribe Active Member

    just got my reply, two actually - one welcoming me as a writer and the other asking me to take the editing test. is this the norm and do any of you do both for them?
     
  4. SF_Express

    SF_Express Active Member

    That's exactly how it works, although quite a bit more sophisticated. They watch what people search for (I don't know what mechanism they have for that), and then they turn those search phrases into the titles of articles. They put those titles in a queue, and then the writers go through queues and pick which titles they'd like to write for.

    They rarely -- perhaps ever now -- take stories where the writer simply suggested a story and then executed it. Not how they work.

    txsportsscribe, I came in strictly from the editing side; I don't know if they want you to take that test so you can edit, too, or if it's part of the writer job.
     
  5. Roscablo

    Roscablo Well-Known Member

    I also got both responses -- accepted as a writer, and the tests for the editor. I would have done both had I passed the editing test round, with a focus on the editing. Now I'll just write some when I find articles I can crank out quickly.

    I applied for both. I don't think writers need to worry about the editing test.
     
  6. MileHigh

    MileHigh Moderator Staff Member

    I know that the editing test is the same for everyone, so that's why they're going to give out the results. The key that I have found and told others with the editing test is to put down what questions you would ask the writers. Point out the problems, the kind of feedback you would give them. Suggestions on how to make the stories better. I think that counts the most, besides catching the other stuff in the copy.
     
  7. Roscablo

    Roscablo Well-Known Member

    I did tons of that. Even suggested some sources that I found. I didn't do any rewriting, which they asked you not to, but made suggestions on some structure. Did delete some repetitive sentences. Again, maybe I was too aggressive. Who knows.
     
  8. txsportsscribe

    txsportsscribe Active Member

    i just finished the editing part 1 test and stuck strictly with spelling, style, etc. errors, of which there were plenty.
     
  9. SF_Express

    SF_Express Active Member

    I was pretty aggressive and did OK...editing with track changes was weird for me. I didn't even like editing in notes mode when I was in print....but if you toggle back to the original view, you can get it straightened out.
     
  10. Desk_dude

    Desk_dude Member

    It's not journalism, although DS pays for some people to belong to Society of Professional Journalists.

    But it is information and sure beats digging ditches, as they say.

    You can edit or write whenever you feel like it as often as you want. You don't need to pay for commuting or nice clothes or meals out. You can work while the TV or radio is on. And you learn stuff about a variety of things.

    The articles rarely have original reporting. Information from the Internet or your own knowledge.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page