Could you be more clueless than this person?

Which means she doesn't know anything.

 

Like I've been telling folks at the office all week, the Brits had been waiting 234 years for another shot at us ... great cover!

 

That cover works well for the NY Post, but not for your average daily.

 

I like the idea for the spin they used.
Kudos to the Post.

 

Wow. What a moron (the Mediaite dweeb, not Blitz or anyone else here).

 

The headline is great, the subhead is wrong.
The U.S. did not play the "British" -- it played England. Unless there were players from Scotland and Wales also on the roster? But no, that sort of team does not exist in the World Cup.
You'd think a newspaper run by a bunch of Aussies would know this. Or maybe the editors figured Yanks were too dumb to understand the difference

 

I would have thought the Post would have had a picture of the English keeper with the hed WHATTA MORON!

 

I was unaware of the Harvard/Yale headline until this thread and even so, my initial reaction was the Post headline is awesome.

 

From across the pond:

"THE HAND OF CLOD" --- main head, U.K. Sunday Mirror.
"Shock 'N Draw. Yankee doddle to Yankee doodoo" deck head accompanying the story.
"God Save Our Green" --- Sunday Mirror back page


"One disastrous spill the Yanks won't complain about" --- deck head, Times of London

"Curses! New keeper cock-up as Green gifts Yanks a point" --- The Sun

"Rob-bish" --- Daily Star

 

I'm sorry, but that's funny.

 

We had the double "HAND OF CLOD" with News of the World.

 

Really bad headline, Post. You should never list a score as 1-1. Everyone knows it should be 1-all.[/tryingtobeoneofthoseguys]