1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Could Tribune employees soon be working for the Koch Bros?

Discussion in 'Journalism topics only' started by LongTimeListener, Mar 12, 2013.

  1. Baron Scicluna

    Baron Scicluna Well-Known Member

    Are you saying there's less scrutiny by the media with the current admininistration or more?

    Because I seem to recall a little war that was started by the previous administration in which the media flat-out was cheerleading for.
     
  2. YGBFKM

    YGBFKM Guest

    I'm talking about the yellow journalism of Hearst and others.
     
  3. 93Devil

    93Devil Well-Known Member

    So was Walter Cronkite on the side of the GOP or the Libs? Do you even remember when there were only four televised national news organizations?

    And thank you, Joe.
     
  4. LongTimeListener

    LongTimeListener Well-Known Member

    Walter Cronkite was a Communist. Haven't you ever seen All In The Family?
     
  5. YankeeFan

    YankeeFan Well-Known Member

    All in the Family was racist.
     
  6. Joe Williams

    Joe Williams Well-Known Member

    Media was cheerleading its Dem icons who were thoroughly on board with the stated reasons for and objectives of that war. And still, there was considerable blowback about "cleaning up Daddy's unfinished business."

    Perhaps we can compare the differences in how Watergate and Benghazi scandals, with trails all the way up to the WH, have been covered. Despite enormous disparity in the severity of the two events.

    Or hell, just ask the people Leno routinely stumps on Jay-Walking a simple question: Have the news media gotten more liberal or more conservative? Even they could come up with obvious answer.
     
  7. Baron Scicluna

    Baron Scicluna Well-Known Member

    Yes, let's compare Watergate vs. Benghazi: One was about covering up a crime committed, as well as other ways to rig the American electoral process. The other was a botched answer given on a TV show about an series of violent attacks several days after it had happened.
     
  8. Uncle.Ruckus

    Uncle.Ruckus Guest

    POLITICS! YAY!!!!!!
     
  9. Joe Williams

    Joe Williams Well-Known Member

    Scoreboard in human toll: Benghazi 4, Watergate 0.

    "Botched answer on a TV show." Yeah, right, falsehood repeated for nearly two weeks by multiple administration members, including POTUS, to keep the story away from re-election was just a big silly "oops!" on "Who Wants To Be A Millionaire?" or something.

    Your lack of skepticism and absence of even-handedness (how the story would be covered, how the questions about be asked and pursued, if Bush were presiding over that event) prove exactly the point I've been making. Anyone whose reaction to this stuff swings according to whose butt is in the Oval Office has no business in any real newsroom, feigning any sort of journalism cred at all.
     
  10. Uncle.Ruckus

    Uncle.Ruckus Guest

    POLITICS EXCELSIOR!!!!!!!
     
  11. Riptide

    Riptide Well-Known Member

    Politics is all about gamesmanship, and now more than ever.
     
  12. YGBFKM

    YGBFKM Guest

    You and Devil need to have a Dumb-Off.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page