1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Clinton: Obama "perpetuating falsehoods"

Discussion in 'Sports and News' started by writing irish, Feb 23, 2008.

  1. Please not the number of times "shrieking" is used. The number of references to her being desperate and shrill. The notion that her doing what every losing candidate in the history of American politics has done is, in her case, descirbed as uniquely Machiavellian, and the many, many references to her as being like Karl Rove, even though they're not in the same politicial phylum. (See tonight's 60 Minutes piece about the railroading of Don Siegelman for details). It's not about tough politics. It's about tough politics coming from a woman.
    Meanwhile, let's all stop worrying about her and keep our eyes on the ball -- which is six or eight months of the ASSOCIATED FREAKING PRESS recycling this kind of bullshit.
    http://apnews.myway.com/article/20080223/D8V053E00.html
     
  2. spinning27

    spinning27 New Member

    And wouldn't you, if the stakes were high enough?
     
  3. Again, this myth of the Clintons as soulless Machivellian automatons is right off the RNC mimeograph.
     
  4. Boom_70

    Boom_70 Well-Known Member

    Its fun watching the Charlie Rangel's and John Lewis's backtrack upon the realization that their support of Hillary puts them out of touch with their constituency.
     
  5. Yeah, I'm sure they'll pay a vast political price for it, too.
    Isn't that what we in the reality-based community call "supporting the nominee"? And isn't it what most people here want HRC to do, like, tomorrow?
    Jesus, Boom.
     
  6. STLIrish

    STLIrish Active Member

    I'd imagine that'll grow tired pretty quick. McCain can score a few points on that stuff, but not all that many unless Obama develops a real case of foot-in-mouth-itis. And if the GOP is going to use "McGovern wing of the party" as a talking point, well, I think it'll play right into Obama's hands of talking about the future instead of having the same arguments we've been having for 40 years. McGovern's only a boogeyman to conservatives over 60. Maybe half the electorate wasn't even born when he ran.
     
  7. Yeah, because "Al Gore is a liar" and "John Kerry made up his service" got old in a hurry.
     
  8. STLIrish

    STLIrish Active Member

    Well, one would hope Obama learns from their mistakes. He seems like a smart guy, and a better politician.
     
  9. STLIrish

    STLIrish Active Member

    Hey, 1000 posts. Woo-hoo.
     
  10. zeke12

    zeke12 Guest

    [​IMG]
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Dec 15, 2014
  11. EStreetJoe

    EStreetJoe Well-Known Member

    If she loses Ohio and/or Texas she'll stay in the race, not mention the losses in her campaign speech that night, not congratulate Obama on the wins in the speech, and continue to march on, hoping that she can get enough pledged delegates to switch their vote and vote for her and get the superdelegates to vote for her, thus winning the nomination despite losing the primaries.
    OR she'll pull a Joe Lieberman - lose the primaries then run in the general election as an independent.
     
  12. Ben_Hecht

    Ben_Hecht Active Member

    Those scenarios . . . I would need to see, to believe.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page