1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Class Status

Discussion in 'Anything goes' started by boots, Aug 4, 2007.

  1. KYSportsWriter

    KYSportsWriter Well-Known Member

    You didn't know Stoob refers to himself in the third person now?

    Anyway, I'd consider $50K to be lower middle class as well. $25K just doesn't go as far as it once did.
     
  2. JR

    JR Well-Known Member

    How can you be vp of a New York bank company and only make $50k?

    That's gotta be a six figure job.
     
  3. PeteyPirate

    PeteyPirate Guest

    I'm rich, bitch.
     
  4. hockeybeat

    hockeybeat Guest

    He works for a small, local chain of banks.
     
  5. spnited

    spnited Active Member

    Plus, JR, banks now throw around "branch VP" titles to mid-level managers in community branches
     
  6. JR

    JR Well-Known Member

    Gotcha.

    I worked at a small place once with six employees.

    There was the President and the other five of us were VP's.

    It was a little like Glengarry Glenn Ross now that I think back on it.
     
  7. Cansportschick

    Cansportschick Active Member

    That's been my motto for years.

    Boots, $50 K is not considered middle class. 100K is and anything over is gravy in my neck of the woods.
     
  8. buckweaver

    buckweaver Active Member

    $25K is not poverty level, but it's damn poor. Basically, you're living like a frat boy. I could barely make ends meet on that salary, and that was living in a very cheap area of Georgia, three years ago.

    $50K is still reasonably low-middle class, in all but the most expensive areas of the country (NYC, D.C., Bay Area, SoCal). But I would consider $75-100K to be middle-middle class these days. It's so expensive to live these days.
     
  9. Big Buckin' agate_monkey

    Big Buckin' agate_monkey Active Member

    And it depends on your family status. I'm supporting me, myself and I; no kids, no family.
     
  10. I think to really have this discussion, you have to discuss total household income.
    If one person makes $30,000, that is different than if they have a spouse who also makes $30,000.
    I'd say a household income of less than $50,000 is poor, but it wouldn't be bad for a single person.
     
  11. shotglass

    shotglass Guest

    I think $75K combined family income is just about the middle-class median line.

    $100K is upper-middle class in all but the most affluent areas.
     
  12. Beaker

    Beaker Active Member

    Class is about much more than income level. Let's say I'm a teacher, and thus have a professional degree-yet (and as some have pointed out, income level can depend on region) I'm making next to nothing. In my mind, my degrees and my profession should make me comfortably middle-class. Yet, lets say, a plumber, for instance lives just down the road. He makes a hell of a lot more money than I do. Now, you could call me pompous or bourgeois, or whatever, but in my mind, he doesn't have nearly the same education I have, or maybe even the same values. Those differences may be manifested in the lifestyles he and I aspire to. So I don't think income alone can't explain "class." As a category (and one of course that is always shifting) class could include factors like class consciousness, lifestyle, social status, income, etc. etc. So while income obviously puts restraints on how we live, I don't think it alone determines our "class" in society.

    Damn-I sound preachy-sorry, just my two cents. :)
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page