Che's spinning.....

Do you see me demanding approval of anyone? Even from you? Or is that what the voices in your head are telling you?

 

The point is, you made a mistake, you refused to admit it.
I said you are an idiot, that is not a mistake.

 

To his credit, he did make a half-hearted attempt at admitting a mistake with his little "error doctor" photo, although it was great the way he a) referred to legit Christians (myself included) as atheists and b) misspelled the word as athiests.

 

Ya' know, "moderator" on any board at SportsJournalists.com should carry some responsibility. Hiding behind the difference between which board it's on is pretty cowardly. You're either a moderator at SportsJournalists.com or you're not.

Back to Yawn's original post. Hillary contradicts herself so badly days apart. Whether you like it or not, Yawn is right about that. And because he is, instead of debating the real point, you instead simply throw insults at Yawn. Shows you have nothing in your quiver.

Does this mean you will treat Yawn with nothing but respect on the board you moderate? I sincerely doubt it.

 

My point now is, you're an asshole, and in extreme denial of it.

 

Tony, you're right on all counts, but to defend me against these twits is like defending the Alamo with B-52s. The matchup is entirely overrated. But the job is done quite quickly, isn't it?

 

Yawn, I think she was probably referring to low-level drug/DUI type offenses in the 1st quote, not Scooter Libby.

But, I'll give it to you, that is a good catch. Frankly, given the shit that went on with the Clinton pardons, this is an issue Hillary might just wanna sit out on.

 

Yes, I do think there were a shitload of criminals the Clintons pardoned. Of course her response to that was that she just passed the letters on, she had no knowledge of who was being pardoned. That was her husband's business. And if believe that, then I've got some "Osama Loves You" buttons for you to wear with pride.

 

Tony, the problem on this one is the originator throws out incomplete quotes to change the context to supposedly support his argument.
I intensely dislike Hillary and think she'd make a horrible Prez, but I don't make stuff up to support my argument, I let the facts stand on their own.

 

Don't like, Markie. You love Hillary and you have an obsession about me. Sad on both notes.

 

Do NOT assume anything.
I will be the happiest person ever if Hillary fails to win the nomination.
I am not obsessed with you, I just like to point out when people misuse the truth and use incomplete quotes.
In case you hadn't noticed, this is a JOURNALISTS board.
Leaving out facts ain't a good idea.