Log in or Sign up

Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Access to private conversations with other members.
- Fewer ads.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Can't Bonds Play 9?

Discussion in 'Sports and News' started by HeinekenMan, Aug 7, 2007.

Page 4 of 4

KYSportsWriter Well-Known Member

buckweaver said:

HeinekenMan said:

If I owned the Giants (and I might someday), he'd be on the field as long as he could still sign his paychecks and hit a ton.
Click to expand...

Do that, and he'd have been sidelined by May. (Of course, maybe that's your plan ;D ...)
Click to expand...

Hey, he wouldn't be anywhere near the record had that happened...

KYSportsWriter, Aug 7, 2007

#37
Smasher_Sloan Active Member

Walter_Sobchak said:

As for your contention that the Giants have no use for him once he hits No. 756, I'll place a wager with you that SF continues to draw terrificly after he goes deep again. That's the use he serves.
Click to expand...

You talking about the rest of this season? Non-point. Those tickets were sold last January.

Smasher_Sloan, Aug 7, 2007

#38

(You must log in or sign up to reply here.)

Page 4 of 4

Share This Page

Search