Cam Cameron's head rolls off the chopping block.

I'm fully aware schedules are made years in advance.

N.C. State went to a bowl game. Utah was 8-4 and won its bowl game. Kentucky was bad but IU beat Kentucky. My point is that when INDIANA is playing three BCS schools I wouldn't call it an easy schedule. For a program like Wisconsin it might be considered an easy schedule. Should Indiana, a team that has made one bowl game since 1993, play USC, LSU, and Boston College in the non-conference?

It isn't like this season when IU played Indiana State, Western Michigan, Akron, and Ball State in the non-conference. My whole point was that if that 2001 team played this year's IU schedule it wins at least eight games.

Was that 2001 team great? Of course not. It was 5-6. It did win at Wisconsin, 63-32, won at Michigan State, beat Northwestern, 56-21, and beat Purdue. I think it's the only IU team this decade that had at least a .500 record in Big Ten play.

You obviously saw them more than I did. I saw them play once that year at Wisconsin. They had about 500 rushing yards that day and looked pretty flippin awesome on offense.