1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Bob Pettit as a pro today.

Discussion in 'Sports and News' started by Upper Tupper, May 14, 2008.

  1. spnited

    spnited Active Member

    True, starman, but in the late 50s and early 60s the Hawks had a reputation as a very racist organization, thanks mostly to Slater Martin
     
  2. spnited

    spnited Active Member

    definitely in St. Loo.
     
  3. Boom_70

    Boom_70 Well-Known Member

    Story was well outlined in the excellent documentary Black Magic but basically Pettit and Cliff Hagan froze out their black rookie teammate- Cleo Hill and refused to pass to him. Remember Hagan played for Adolph Rupp.

    Here is full story:

    http://www.blackathlete.net/artman2/publish/Basketball_6/Rebound_From_Racism.shtml
     
  4. spnited

    spnited Active Member

    Cleo Hill, not Cleo James, Boom.
    And yes, Cleo is a very bitter man about to this day.
     
  5. broadway joe

    broadway joe Guest

    That description of Pettit pretty much fits Garnett just as well. KG also has the edge in height and athleticism. I'm not disputing Pettit's greatness, but to say he'd make KG look like a fool seems like a pretty big stretch.
     
  6. mustangj17

    mustangj17 Active Member

    He's a sharp shooter, always a job for a sharp shooter.
     

  7. This is, of course, racist bullshit.
     
  8. Boom_70

    Boom_70 Well-Known Member

    Just proves that Bush No child left behind law does not work.
     
  9. 93Devil

    93Devil Well-Known Member

    Pettit was one of the best players of his generation, so I am guessing he had some raw ability.

    Under today's current system, if he was born into it, he would be doing just as fine, but you might not be able to recognize his style of play. That would be altered as well.

    If you argue that he would not do well because today's game is different, then you need to be willing to say that certain players who play today would fail 40 years ago because their game (can't shoot or pass) would conversely fail.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page