1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Bama tea bagger gets two years

Discussion in 'Sports and News' started by hondo, Oct 2, 2012.

  1. Uncle.Ruckus

    Uncle.Ruckus Guest

    Is no one going to fucking acknowledge this? Fuck you all.
     
  2. Tarheel316

    Tarheel316 Well-Known Member

    Punk should have got more than two years.
     
  3. Stoney

    Stoney Well-Known Member

    How do you know there wasn't any security? Just because it happened there doesn't automatically make Krystal liable. Sometimes shit like this just happens even though the venue did nothing wrong.

    The question is whether Krystal imposed reasonable industry security and training measures under the circumstances, and whether a failure to impose them caused this to happen. Reasonable security measures here does not mean keeping the drunks out of a Krystal next to Bourbon Street after midnight. There's no reasonable expectation that the Bourbon Street Krystal will be drunk-free when you enter it at that hour, instead the expectation is that you'll be surrounded by barely anything but drunks. Drunks are the voluntary risk assumption when you enter that place at that hour (not to mention the fact that the victim here assumed further risk by entering as a soon to be passed out drunk himself).

    If you can show Krystal employees witnessed the tea-bagging, could've stopped it, but did nothing, you might have a solid negligence theory. If you could show they had no security on duty, or failed to abide by other security measures expected under the circumstances, you might have a solid negligence theory. But you're not gonna get far arguing that they're negligent merely because drunks were there--instead a judge is gonna laugh at you and toss your suit out before it ever gets near a jury.

    That said, I suspect a skilled PI attorney could find a way to squeeze a settlement out of Krystal here, whether warranted or not.
     
  4. Armchair_QB

    Armchair_QB Well-Known Member

    And, to be clear, I'm not saying a suit would have merit. But that doesn't mean Krystal wouldn't settle anyway.
     
  5. Drip

    Drip Active Member

    There's a Krystal's employee in the video.
     
  6. Tarheel316

    Tarheel316 Well-Known Member

    True. Under the tort system we have it's often cheaper to settle than defend.
     
  7. dixiehack

    dixiehack Well-Known Member

    The best part of this is when all Krystal employees have to start watching training videos on what to do if a patron starts rubbing his junk on the face of a passed-out drunk. How do you put out a casting call for that in Chattanooga?
     
  8. TheSportsPredictor

    TheSportsPredictor Well-Known Member

    Supposed to be an article about the trial in an upcoming ESPN The Magazine. Don't know what happens now that the trial was not held. I imagine there will still be something.
     
  9. Drip

    Drip Active Member

    Perhaps a frame by frame pictorial?
     
  10. Point of Order

    Point of Order Active Member

    Free Krystals for life*









    *add cheese for $0.20
     
  11. JosephC.Myers

    JosephC.Myers Active Member

    There are some people out there who would gladly take that as a settlement for a lawsuit.
     
  12. Armchair_QB

    Armchair_QB Well-Known Member

    Those people went to Auburn.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page