1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Arizona, site of next Super Bowl, sends anti-gay bill to governor

Discussion in 'Sports and News' started by LongTimeListener, Feb 23, 2014.

  1. LongTimeListener

    LongTimeListener Well-Known Member

    And why did those black folk need to be treated well at Denny's anyway? Couldn't they have eaten at IHOP?

    Good Christ.
     
  2. Paynendearse

    Paynendearse Member

    Apples and oranges dude.
    Anyone can go in and eat at Denny's. Gays aren't chased from there.
    We're talking about assisting in a ceremony. It's really no different than opting out of the military draft in the 60s on religious grounds.
     
  3. Paynendearse

    Paynendearse Member

    You're forcing people to do something against their religion. Something about separation of church and state there....again, take the money and go give to someone that will do you a good job.
     
  4. LongTimeListener

    LongTimeListener Well-Known Member

    Fortunately for you, Apple and Marriott called the governor and expressed their intention to do just that. Miracle of the marketplace!
     
  5. DanOregon

    DanOregon Well-Known Member

  6. BDC99

    BDC99 Well-Known Member

    Actually, apples and apples. If a business is discriminating against gays, it's exactly the same as Denny's not allowing black customers. Sure, they COULD (and per your point, probably SHOULD) go to IHOP. But why should they have to?
     
  7. Armchair_QB

    Armchair_QB Well-Known Member

    Hell, what if the Cardinals draft him?

    I don't remember the timeline but how many months out was the NFL from Super Bowl XXVII when they pulled it?
     
  8. LongTimeListener

    LongTimeListener Well-Known Member

    Two or three years in advance. By the time that Super Bowl was played (it was the Cowboys' first rout of the Bills, in Pasadena), Arizona had already voted in MLK Day.
     
  9. Morris816

    Morris816 Member

    I understand the point about not doing business with a business that engages in discriminatory practices. But the discriminatory practice is still wrong to begin with.

    The First Amendment only comes into play for religious organizations and institutions. A private, for-profit business that serves the general public doesn't qualify as such.

    A person refusing to do business with gays because the person doesn't believe in gay marriage is like an atheist refusing to serve Christians because the atheist thinks Christianity is hogwash. You're using your belief (religious or otherwise) for the sake of deciding who you want to do business with, which translates to discrimination, and that's wrong.
     
  10. Armchair_QB

    Armchair_QB Well-Known Member

    Be interesting to see if they could pull it off in less than 12 months.
     
  11. LongTimeListener

    LongTimeListener Well-Known Member

    Yeah, but I don't think it will be necessary. Sounds like the calls from Apple and Marriott, plus just the idea of the NFL making that move, are causing cooler heads to prevail.
     
  12. PCLoadLetter

    PCLoadLetter Well-Known Member

    Oh, there's no way in hell Brewer signs it. At this point, it's just a question of when she vetoes it. I suspect it's done late tomorrow afternoon. She just returned from DC today, so by tomorrow she can say she talked to both sides and decided on a veto. Typically she'd stretch it out and milk it, but the publicity isn't helping anyone.

    Jan Brewer is not an intelligent woman by any stretch of the imagination, but she's very politically savvy. This is a no-brainer for her.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page