1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Are too many strikeouts hurting the game of baseball?

Discussion in 'Sports and News' started by Dick Whitman, Mar 3, 2014.

  1. JC

    JC Well-Known Member

    Re: Does baseball have a strikeout problem?

    Is baseball not more popular than ever?
     
  2. RickStain

    RickStain Well-Known Member

    The main reason offense is down is that average velocity is shooting up. Seems like we're getting a generation of pitchers with better coaching from a young age.
     
  3. Steak Snabler

    Steak Snabler Well-Known Member

    And their arms are being protected from an early age (and if they do blow out, they can be repaired).
     
  4. 93Devil

    93Devil Well-Known Member

    And drugs.
     
  5. Riptide

    Riptide Well-Known Member

    Too many errors in baseball, too.
    Hurting our beloved game, etc., etc.

    Can MLB ban the errors? Thanks.
     
  6. Dick Whitman

    Dick Whitman Well-Known Member

    Actually, the top 13 fielding seasons, by fielding percentage, in Major League Baseball history have come the last 13 years.

    Last year, 2013, saw players post the top fielding percentage in baseball history: .985.
     
  7. Mizzougrad96

    Mizzougrad96 Active Member

    I think more strikeouts is great for baseball. It speeds up the game and there's nothing more dramatic that seeing the ace pitcher or ace reliever facing off against a team's best hitter. I don't want to see a ground out or a fly out. I want to see a hit (preferrably a home run) or a strikeout.
     
  8. outofplace

    outofplace Well-Known Member

    I don't know that it speeds up the game. I guess it depends how many pitches a batter is seeing in an at-bat when he strikes out as compared to how many he sees when he makes an out with a fly ball or grounder. I'd guess he is seeing more when he strikes out, which makes the game longer.
     
  9. Mizzougrad96

    Mizzougrad96 Active Member

    True... A guy like Greg Maddux was usually the most efficient pitcher and he wasn't a huge strikeout guy, at least not at the level of Clemens, Martinez, Schilling, Johnson etc...

    I think the power pitchers might not be as "efficient" as someone like Maddux, but still faster than your typical starter.
     
  10. Dick Whitman

    Dick Whitman Well-Known Member

    Yeah, I think it slows down the game. That's my guess, at least.

    One thing that I thought about while pondering this topic some more last night: You hear a lot of old-timers gripe and bitch and moan about how pitchers are babied today. That they should throw more complete games. That they should use four-man rotations. That closers should be used for more than an inning. That relief specialists are an example of over-managing.

    But here's the thing: The proof is in the pudding, right? Pitching is getting better, better than it's ever been in many ways. There are less walks and more strikeouts. The only thing that is neutralizing things and keeping 2014 from being 1968 redux is that hitters hit more home runs than they used to.

    But it's hard to argue that pitchers need to sack up when the incentives for organizations, results wise, are to do things as they are right now. Guys are healthy and peaking when they are used.
     
  11. outofplace

    outofplace Well-Known Member

    Also, it's not like the pitchers are always taking themselves out of games. The good ones usually want to stay in longer.
     
  12. Mizzougrad96

    Mizzougrad96 Active Member

    This is interesting...

    http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/how-much-time-the-pitchers-took/
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page