1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

AP Stylebook: "More than" and "over" now mean the same thing

Discussion in 'Journalism topics only' started by spikechiquet, Mar 20, 2014.

  1. Double J

    Double J Active Member

    The long-gone and not-at-all-lamented DyePack is trolling people on Twitter over this issue. Fucking lame asshole.
     
  2. TopSpin

    TopSpin Member

    Over one sports writer strongly disagrees with the AP based on this thread.
     
  3. expendable

    expendable Well-Known Member

     
  4. Double J

    Double J Active Member

    Lol, good catch. :)
     
  5. jr/shotglass

    jr/shotglass Well-Known Member

    I saw this thread and thought there would be slightly deeper discussion on this than how many asinine ways you can insert "more than" for "over."
     
  6. Double J

    Double J Active Member

    As opposed to the number of different ways we could all say AP's decision sucks?

    The fact that the discussion turned ridiculous in this way is actually a pretty good indicator of how we all feel about it.
     
  7. jr/shotglass

    jr/shotglass Well-Known Member

    I guess. My fault for expecting too much.
     
  8. Inky_Wretch

    Inky_Wretch Well-Known Member

    You're over welcome to discuss that angle of this change too. Don't morethananalyze it though.
     
  9. Double J

    Double J Active Member

    Here's an idea - lead the discussion in the direction you would like it to go.
     
  10. jr/shotglass

    jr/shotglass Well-Known Member

    OK, dude. You've made your point. I won't disagree with the kids again.
     
  11. Inky_Wretch

    Inky_Wretch Well-Known Member

    Would you like to discuss it seriously? OK.

    I think it's a stupid change. Do you?
     
  12. jr/shotglass

    jr/shotglass Well-Known Member

    The point was not that I had anything productive to say on the matter either, Inky.

    The point was that I give this board enough credence to think that the subject wouldn't disintegrate into that.

    But I think you and Double J know that's what I was saying. I just had to be spanked for being snarky. Accomplished.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page