1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Another discussion on how to quote athletes

Discussion in 'Journalism topics only' started by SF_Express, Mar 22, 2009.

  1. RickStain

    RickStain Well-Known Member

    My simple rule: would someone outside of journalism listening to a recording of the quote notice the difference?
     
  2. buckweaver

    buckweaver Active Member

    Roberto Clemente, for one, would like you to clean up his quotes.
     
  3. Johnny Dangerously

    Johnny Dangerously Well-Known Member

    My favorite baseball player of all time.
     
  4. DavidPoole

    DavidPoole Member

    I am going to say this one more time. It is hypocritical to say that a reporter's copy can be edited for spelling and grammar and then say that quotes are "sacred" and can't be touched. It's contradictory on the face of it. Mark is right. There is a difference between spoken and written English.
     
  5. I Digress

    I Digress Guest

    No...fixing grammatical error goes far beyond eliminating 'ohs, ahs, uhs, you knows and likes'......they are completely different things.....and I agree with whoever said that before tape recorders, this wasn't even a discussion.
     
  6. RickStain

    RickStain Well-Known Member

    Unless the entire story is surrounded by special marks saying "this is exactly what was written word for word," then that argument makes no sense.

    I agree with the part about there being a difference between written and spoken English. That makes much more sense.
     
  7. buckweaver

    buckweaver Active Member

    Yep. And an absolute disgrace the way his quotes were written up by contemporary reporters. My standard is: treat a source the way you'd wish to be treated; don't embarrass them by making them sound stupid when they're not. If quotes are that sacred, make a podcast and let people listen to the interview so they can judge for themselves. In writing, a little cleaning up never hurt anybody. The purpose of using the quote is to get the message across -- even if it's a message they didn't intend to send -- so the grammar and "uhh's" aren't nearly as important as ... capturing the spirit of the thing.
     
  8. mike311gd

    mike311gd Active Member

    Roberto Clemente had that same problem.
     
  9. mike311gd

    mike311gd Active Member

    Very well.
     
  10. Twoback

    Twoback Active Member

    No. I'm saying the writer should have cleaned it up. I'm not giving you advice on how to be a PR guy. That's my wife's deal. :)
     
  11. Gold

    Gold Active Member

    Unless it is somebody who is running for president, governor, or a state legislator or city council member, some of the language should usually be cleaned up so the reader can understand it.

    I remember one horse racing writer who would use phonetic sounds to say what Spanish-speaking jockey. The problem there is that he didn't do it for a jockey who would speak with a Noo Yawk Italian accent or a jockey of another ethnic group.

    The other thing is that in an interview, somebody might leave out articles or other parts of speech because they are just trying to say what happened quickly without pausing to put it in a form which would look good in the newspaper. If they waited to do that, they would probably censor themselves and be less honest.
     
  12. spikechiquet

    spikechiquet Well-Known Member

    So would Jimmy Snuka and The Ultimate Warrior
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page