1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

AL Cy Young

Discussion in 'Sports and News' started by Dick Whitman, Aug 19, 2010.

  1. outofplace

    outofplace Well-Known Member

    Lee went from a great pitcher's park to a great hitter's park, a place where he has always pitched badly. I don't think he is as bad as his last couple of starts, but the fade is for real, if just because of the change in his home field.
     
  2. 93Devil

    93Devil Well-Known Member

    And CC and Clay pitch in hitters parks while the King pitches in Yellowstone.
     
  3. Dick Whitman

    Dick Whitman Well-Known Member

    Why not?

    Anything that wins may indicate about a pitcher - such as the ability to pitch deep into games, for example - a closer look at other performance indicators and game logs can indicate even better. And voters have more than enough time to examine the entire record.

    Why should wins, the one statistic that pitchers have the least control over, matter even in the slightest when evaluating a pitcher's performance?
     
  4. outofplace

    outofplace Well-Known Member

    If you want to figure that in, you have to consider the huge difference in the talent level around each guy as well.
     
  5. 93Devil

    93Devil Well-Known Member

    I don't. All these variables are stupid.
     
  6. Oz

    Oz Well-Known Member

    Looks like Hernandez is just as good away from Yellowstone.

    Hernandez at home -- 13 games, 95.0 innings, 6-4, 2.46 ERA, 3 CG, 94 Ks, 20 BB
    Hernandez on road -- 14 games, 102.0 innings, 3-6, 2.56 ERA, 2 CG, SO, 89 Ks, 35 BB
     
  7. Dick Whitman

    Dick Whitman Well-Known Member

    Not according to the win hawks on the board.
     
  8. YankeeFan

    YankeeFan Well-Known Member

    None of the statistics you can cite control for all variables.

    They don't account for one pitcher facing the Yankees, Angels, & Redsox 11 times, while another only faces them 3 times.

    They don't account for one pitcher starting 16 or 17 games in a hitter's park, while another pitches his home games in a pitcher's park.

    They don't account for one pitcher having a shortstop with range of Derek Jeter behind him who doesn't get to as many balls as a shortstop with tremendous range.

    I'm all for looking at all of the stats.

    But to ignore wins is ludicrous. If a pitcher has 20 wins, then he consistently out pitched his opponent.

    Sure there are variables to be considered. Just as there are in the stats you're focusing on.
     
  9. TheSportsPredictor

    TheSportsPredictor Well-Known Member

  10. YankeeFan

    YankeeFan Well-Known Member

    Thanks for boiling it down for me. :)
     
  11. JC

    JC Well-Known Member

    Who the hell can argue with such an educated take like that.
     
  12. RickStain

    RickStain Well-Known Member

    There are number of statistics available that account for all of these things. It's pretty easy to do, actually.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page