Again, another example of why gay rights just isn't the stopping point.

http://shine.yahoo.com/parenting/indiana-anti-gay-prom-plan-sparks-backlash-173857067.html

Can we say first amendment?

Of course, the teacher, while honest with her thoughts, should have been smart enough to see the baiting from the reporter who asked whether gays had any purpose. What was the context or purpose in that question if not to bait? No way that question wasn't packed with an agenda.

And now, the gay community leaders are calling for the dismissal of this woman. Forget her job performance record as the basis of whether she keeps her job or not.

Seriously, those who preach tolerance show their intolerance, or selective tolerance, of one who doesn't agree with them.

 

About 70 percent English. You're getting better.

 

What if she had said: "Niggers should not attend prom"?

Just being honest with her thoughts? No job ramifications?

 

The thread titles are actually approaching a point of coherence.

 

Dog, why would you give a shit if a gay guy attended your prom?

 

What is the stopping point?

 

Because his daddy taught him it was OK to beat up queers, and that's the way it should always be!

 

Dog is ready to make the move from clerk to reporter.

 

Yeah, I'm past that part of dealing with his posts. You know it's going to be half-English, so just go from there.

 

What type of cigarettes are the best to smoke while beating up queers?

 

She didn't say "fags".....compare apples to apples please.

 

Why is that relevant under the First Amendment?