1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

A NYT Lede That Duplicates Wikipedia

Discussion in 'Journalism topics only' started by YankeeFan, Jul 30, 2014.

  1. MisterCreosote

    MisterCreosote Well-Known Member

    She obviously plagiarized, as current events show, according to Dick Whitman.
     
  2. Dick Whitman

    Dick Whitman Well-Known Member

    That's not what you're doing in that case. You're changing words just to change words.
     
  3. SnarkShark

    SnarkShark Well-Known Member

    Not necessarily. I think "were roommates" is better-phrased than "roomed together," but that's just me.
     
  4. Dick Whitman

    Dick Whitman Well-Known Member

    What if Montville had written "were roommates"?
     
  5. SnarkShark

    SnarkShark Well-Known Member

    If I had wheels, I'd be a bicycle.
     
  6. Dick Whitman

    Dick Whitman Well-Known Member

    Montville writes: "In 1945, Williams and Doerr were roommates."

    You write: "According to Montville, in 1945, Williams and Doerr were roomates."

    Plagiarism?
     
  7. SnarkShark

    SnarkShark Well-Known Member

    You are insufferable.

    I would say, when in doubt, that passage should be quoted if it is taken directly from another written source
     
  8. Dick Whitman

    Dick Whitman Well-Known Member

    Otherwise plagiarism?
     
  9. MisterCreosote

    MisterCreosote Well-Known Member

    Fixed.
     
  10. Dick Whitman

    Dick Whitman Well-Known Member

    Not to mention that Vogel didn't quote directly. She paraphrased.
     
  11. SnarkShark

    SnarkShark Well-Known Member

    I'm not a copyright lawyer, man.

    The most defensible action, in this case, is to quote if you are lifting exact words from another written source.
     
  12. Dick Whitman

    Dick Whitman Well-Known Member

    Vogel didn't lift exact words.

    Which is why "according to Wikipedia" would have made it not plagiarism.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page