1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

A. Jaeger - I lost '83 Wimbledon final on purpose

Discussion in 'Sports and News' started by Moderator1, Jul 5, 2008.

  1. Starman

    Starman Well-Known Member

    Any time you're on the field/court of play, you do your best to win.

    Anything less is a display of contempt for yourself, your opponent, and the game.

    And to come back 25 years later and claim you were blitzed in a match (which from all available evidence, you probably would have lost decisively anyway) because you decided you wanted to lose, does the same thing.

    Andrea Jaeger has some issues. From all appearances, she appears to be happy and content and doing good things as a nun, and good for her. She had a very good career, and it was prematurely derailed by truly significant injuries., not drugs or dope or anything else.

    Yet every few months or so, you read a story about her, and almost always, there are a few graphs in this vein -- more or less pumping herself up to be better than she was, or inventing boogeymen to explain why things went wrong.
     
  2. Ben_Hecht

    Ben_Hecht Active Member

    VERY self-serving statement.

    And the timing's ludicrous.
     
  3. Second Thoughts

    Second Thoughts Active Member

    She night not have tried in the match at all, or got behind early and in her mind "threw it" or just gave up, quit.

    But if so, she did it because she thought she had no chance to win. Martina would have beaten her badly anyway so it's BS. Getting whipped all over the court and then coming back a couple decades later and saying Oh I meant to lose that, isn't anything to take serious.
     
  4. WriteThinking

    WriteThinking Well-Known Member

    You know what?

    Martina Navratilova is so honest, in-your-face and competitive, that I think she would have seen right through someone who was really intentionally trying to lose a Wimbledon final against her and would have called them on it.

    If it had really happened.

    Jaeger may have not cared much, herself, whether she did win, or not. She may not, in fact, have played her best and to her full potential that day. But that happens to athletes. It happens to everybody. You're not at your best every day, every time out.

    She may have thought she'd hurt/bothered Navratilova, and so, was trying to be nice, or, she may have been upset about a run-in with her father.

    But she did the best she could on that day, and Navratilova, obviously, did way better. Martina won, fair and square, with no help from Jaeger.

    She just didn't need it.

    I doubt there's anyone who would think that she did.
     
  5. gingerbread

    gingerbread Well-Known Member

    She's a nun! Whether she described it as completely accurate, that's for her mind and demons to figure. But I don't think she's making something up to get publicity, or to sell a book.
    Again, she's a nun!
    Whatever you think about organized religion, there has to be something pure about this "confession." Just has to.
     
  6. Starman

    Starman Well-Known Member

    Uh, no, there doesn't.
     
  7. gingerbread

    gingerbread Well-Known Member

    I've pretty much lost faith after 30-something years of Catholicism, but I'm going to chose to believe that Andrea's calling led her to attempt to set the record right here. However she remembers it, I don't doubt it's what's real to her right now. Some lucky British journo just happened to ask her the right question. Andrea probably has other things she'd like to get off her chest from those days, but maybe needs prodding. I have a friend who became a nun at age 35, after living quite the wild-child life, and she reminds me of Andrea in this case. What they remember might not be completely correct, but it is how they process it now.
     
  8. Football_Bat

    Football_Bat Well-Known Member

    Interesting she kept her name after becoming a nun. Most who join an order adopt a new first name to reflect their new life.

    Modern nuns don't wear the habit outfit except in formal settings.
     
  9. A confession is between you and your priest.

    Running to the newspaper to claim that you lost because you didn't give your all is not a confession. And it's hardly nun-like. What purpose does it serve if it's not self serving?
     
  10. What principle is there in hollowing someone else's victory?
     
  11. Overrated

    Overrated Guest

    WFFuckinW. If you're going to throw a match, take it to your grave...especially if you're a nun.
     
  12. Sam Mills 51

    Sam Mills 51 Well-Known Member

    Every story I've read and the couple of Real Sports pieces I've seen on her tends to lean to her telling the truth in this case. Sure, we're skeptical types and I usually lead that parade, but if there's an exception to the rule, this is Exhibit A.

    Andrea Jaeger never said she would have mashed Martina Navratilova at Wimbledon had she been at the top of her game, but she's a nun, she's not doing this for money or a publicity stunt and she has long moved on to a life well beyond tennis.

    From all accounts, Jaeger probably would have been more uncomfortable with her life and the lifestyle had she climbed to No. 1 in the world. She's a strong a case as can be made about the saying of having the courage to win and ascend to the top.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page