1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

2020 NFL Off-season

Discussion in 'Sports and News' started by heyabbott, Dec 30, 2019.

  1. Sam Mills 51

    Sam Mills 51 Well-Known Member

    And just think ... he won't get blamed by the Metroplex and national NFL media for consistent failure. Not to mention much less sore when he gets up Monday morning.
     
  2. Michael_ Gee

    Michael_ Gee Well-Known Member

    The key carrot for the players is real big raises of the minimum salaries, 20 percent at least. 60 percent of players make the minimum for their service time group.
     
  3. DanOregon

    DanOregon Well-Known Member

    Removing restrictions that protect owners would do a better job raising salaries. Fringe players are left fighting for scraps because of a team's cap situation. Free agency is a game of musical chairs for players with owners deciding where to put the chairs and when to stop the music. Or even if the player gets to play (Franchise tag) I don't know why the players put up with it.
     
  4. DanOregon

    DanOregon Well-Known Member

    The more I think about it - the number doesn't seem as dumb as it first appears. Romo is about the only one at CBS Sports has who is under 60. If they plan to have an NFL contract in three years, they'll need some continuity when Nantz and JB retire. I do wonder if that number will include a tv or radio show on CBSSN, a game show or reality hosting deal, golf coverage etc.
    CBS is known for pinching pennies on even its hit shows.
     
  5. DanOregon

    DanOregon Well-Known Member

  6. Scout

    Scout Well-Known Member

    Is there any chance CBS buys MNF from ESPN?

    If so, 17 for Romo is a bargain.
     
  7. Chef2

    Chef2 Well-Known Member

    Been slammed the last 3 days, but caught the clip of the Simmons kid from Clemson at the combine.
    6'3 and some.
    239 pounds
    4.39--40
    Good freaking grief.
    This kid is a freak of nature.
     
  8. Chef2

    Chef2 Well-Known Member

    They probably won't have to "buy" it.
    IIRC, WWL's MNF package expires in 21 at 1.9 billion per.
    CBS isn't going to overpay Romo and not get MNF.
     
  9. MileHigh

    MileHigh Moderator Staff Member

    Outside of Sunday night, the 2:25 p.m. MST slot rates higher -- and gets better games -- than MNF. And CBS isn't keeping a package without being in the Super Bowl rotation.

    It will be interesting to watch what ESPN/ABC/Disney does in this next round. First, they need to get their booth and production cleaned up. Second, they clearly want in on getting a Super Bowl. And not only, likely, two more weeks of programming -- 17th game, extra bye -- but two more playoff games will be out there.
     
    Last edited: Mar 1, 2020
  10. Michael_ Gee

    Michael_ Gee Well-Known Member

    I don't see CBS giving up a night of much cheaper prime time sitcoms, cop shows, etc. for MNF. They happily let Fox take the whole Thursday night package after just one season.
     
  11. Spartan Squad

    Spartan Squad Well-Known Member

    Reading this makes this OBJ Tweet suddenly make so much more sense

     
  12. sgreenwell

    sgreenwell Well-Known Member

    If they're paying $1B plus per year for football rights, then $17M for the best broadcaster at the network almost seems cheap. Almost. Kind of like how its weird Belichick makes "only" around $12M a year.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page