1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

2016 NBA Offseason Thread

Discussion in 'Sports and News' started by Big Circus, Jun 23, 2016.

  1. LongTimeListener

    LongTimeListener Well-Known Member

    Until next summer when the cap goes up even more.
     
  2. LanceyHoward

    LanceyHoward Well-Known Member

    That's ludicrous. The Kings have been the worst run franchise in sports since the 2008 financial crisis. That is when the the Maloof's saw their casino go broke and their Bank of America stock tanked and franchise started cutting salary.
     
    Last edited: Jul 1, 2016
  3. Spartan Squad

    Spartan Squad Well-Known Member

    Very true. I just can't fathom next year yet. In the short term there's going to be teams, Atlanta I'm looking in your direction, who are going to have some very expensive embarrassments and some very pissed off fans.
     
  4. JC

    JC Well-Known Member

    Why? Owners are still getting the same percentage
     
  5. old_tony

    old_tony Well-Known Member

    Because they're paying out bigger and bigger percentages.
     
  6. LongTimeListener

    LongTimeListener Well-Known Member

    No they aren't. The cap is a defined percentage of revenues. The cap going up means owners are getting it by the truckload.
     
  7. old_tony

    old_tony Well-Known Member

    And teams continually go over the cap. This isn't a hard cap like the NFL. It's a soft cap, and teams go over it with all the "exceptions." And when teams end up over the cap, they pay a luxury tax, which also comes out of the owner's pocket.

    I'm not defending the owners. It's their own fault. But this is exactly what led to the lockout in 1998 and 2011 -- owners not controling their own spending, and then needing to change the system to protect themselves. Notice these were lockouts, not strikes.
     
  8. JC

    JC Well-Known Member

    Wrong. Can't believe how stunned people are in this thread.
     
  9. JC

    JC Well-Known Member

    So what's the difference in revenue from last year for the owners?
     
  10. LanceyHoward

    LanceyHoward Well-Known Member

    The new television contracts started to kick in.
     
  11. JC

    JC Well-Known Member

    Exactly, so players benefit
     
  12. JohnHammond

    JohnHammond Well-Known Member

    old_tony math is the best. "Even higher percentages." Priceless.

    Even better is believing the luxury tax means owners are paying out even more to the players.
     
    LongTimeListener likes this.
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page