1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Great Recession did in print. I think this upcoming one takes out local TV news.

Discussion in 'Journalism topics only' started by exmediahack, Jun 17, 2022.

  1. exmediahack

    exmediahack Well-Known Member

    Just the vibes out there as I see the numbers.

    Once the ad money stops flowing through, I'm not sure I see it coming back to local TV newscasts.

    Competing with streaming and sleep is an endless battle. Sure, some of the "cold & old" markets will survive but, outside of that, I just don't see a lucrative audience for us.

    This is a bit different as, during economic recession, people usually come back to us because we're free. I think this will be different -- the final TKO of our fading influence.
     
    maumann likes this.
  2. justgladtobehere

    justgladtobehere Well-Known Member

    The economics of local news seems absurd to me. Boston has five stations, all doing at least 3 hours of morning local news. Each one has two anchors, a meteorologist, a traffic person, and at least 3 reporters. All for a hundred thousand viewers each.

    Yet the Fox station and an independent station air close to 12 hours of news on weekdays.
     
  3. wicked

    wicked Well-Known Member

    What are stations going to replace it with? A third showing of Steve Harvey? A lot of the other options to fill slots are unappealing. You can use the same feature segment on three or four newscasts. Passable anchors for lesser dayparts are aplenty and come cheaply. I wouldn’t be so pessimistic.
     
    Last edited: Jun 17, 2022
    exmediahack likes this.
  4. All I know is that online or streaming video advertising — such as YouTube, Hulu or Twitch — is much cheaper and much more targeted than local TV news advertising.
     
  5. PCLoadLetter

    PCLoadLetter Well-Known Member

    We’ll be fine thru 2024 on political advertising alone.
     
  6. DanOregon

    DanOregon Well-Known Member

    Always thought the morning news was where they made their bank. Two or three hours "updating" the 11 p.m. news, maybe one reporter and a weather person, and a producer. A lot of local news stations have the anchor "directing" from the anchor desk, switching cameras, rolling tape. I think the one thing that makes morning news shows almost bullet proof is that the TV is on and there is minimal switching - if any - since people are getting dressed, having breakfast and making lunch for the kids.
     
  7. BYH 2: Electric Boogaloo

    BYH 2: Electric Boogaloo Well-Known Member

    And then we're all thoroughly fucked.
     
  8. PCLoadLetter

    PCLoadLetter Well-Known Member

    Huh?
     
  9. DanOregon

    DanOregon Well-Known Member

    You haven't seen a broadcast where the anchor has a "clicker" thing in their hand when they are doing the news? I figured it was to direct cameras - i was wrong, it controls the teleprompter.

     
  10. PCLoadLetter

    PCLoadLetter Well-Known Member

    Yes, it's the prompter.
     
  11. BartonK

    BartonK Active Member

    When I watch the local news, the ads are all local home-improvement people: Window World, roofers, plumbers, Bath Fitters, Empire carpeting, etc. When I watch prime-time programming, it seems to be all prescriptions, all the time. You hardly ever see "traditional" advertisers from 20+ years ago: soft drinks, beer, airlines.
     
  12. PCLoadLetter

    PCLoadLetter Well-Known Member

    Thank god for accident lawyers and “we’ll buy your home” ads.

    I used to do a noon newscast. Lots of ads for tubs with doors.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page