1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

President Trump: The NEW one and only politics thread

Discussion in 'Sports and News' started by Moderator1, Nov 12, 2016.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Songbird

    Songbird Well-Known Member

  2. Guy_Incognito

    Guy_Incognito Well-Known Member

    Webster, Neutral Corner and heyabbott like this.
  3. Inky_Wretch

    Inky_Wretch Well-Known Member

    Meanwhile, in the Roger Stone sentencing hearing ...

     
    garrow likes this.
  4. Songbird

    Songbird Well-Known Member

    No, the point is, how many of those students are there (under $80K) right now?

    If acceptance rates don't change to let in more > $80K students then it's just lip service.

    If they start letting in droves of > $80K students then it's a good move.
     
  5. The Big Ragu

    The Big Ragu Moderator Staff Member

    Acceptances are presumably tied to their admissions standards, not to financial need.

    This is purely about ability for people who do meet those admissions standards, and gain admission, to be able to afford to go.

    Harvard and Stanford do something similar, although the thresshold is $150K, not $80K. Those schools also have much larger endowments with which to subsidize students.
     
  6. garrow

    garrow Well-Known Member

  7. Cosmo

    Cosmo Well-Known Member

    The day this piece of excrement goes goes tits up, it's going to severely test my moral code of "letting the body cool as people mourn," a la Kobe.
     
    Last edited: Feb 20, 2020
    cyclingwriter2 and Slacker like this.
  8. GilGarrido

    GilGarrido Active Member

    With Bloomberg in the race, five of the six individuals who have been elected NYC mayor or Senator from New York since 2000 have run for the presidency. I don't remember that being the case in the previous 25 years; were John Lindsay in 1972 and RFK in 1968 the most recent pre-2000 ones? Nelson Rockefeller in 1968 if you count governors. Seems ironic that the one of the six who hasn't run is Chuck Schumer, who's not exactly known for disliking publicity. (The line I remember from living in the DC area was that the most dangerous place in Washington was between Schumer and a TV camera.)
     
  9. goalmouth

    goalmouth Well-Known Member

  10. heyabbott

    heyabbott Well-Known Member

    How will the trumpsters handle their anti Semitic nature’s in attacking Bernie or Bloomberg with their evangelical zealotry of Israel?
     
    lakefront likes this.
  11. Inky_Wretch

    Inky_Wretch Well-Known Member

    Much like Soros, they are part of the cabal of Jews leading the New World Order.

    Plus, as you know, the Huckabeeites only care about Israel because they want to trigger the end times there.
     
    lakefront likes this.
  12. heyabbott

    heyabbott Well-Known Member

    Is Sarah Slanders Huckster the biblical Red Heifer?
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page