Suburban Houston School Shooting...

Sorry, but no, that simply isn't true. There are times you just don't like my answer, so you refuse to accept the evidence backing it up. When a poster's entire argument within a certain discussion backs up what I'm saying, I'm not refusing to show my work.

More importantly, you really need to get over the arrogant-to-the-point-of-delusional idea you have that just because you interpret something differently, the other person doesn't understand the point. I've seen enough of what you have to say around here to know you clearly aren't intelligent enough to be pushing that idea.

But hey, you got likes from a couple of posters who would put a like on just about anything as long as it's negative about me, so I guess you can call your day a success.

 

LOL

 

I reject your premise.

Guess I am arrogant.

 

You have a special kind of intelligence OOP.

 

Clearly, and given how little you contribute, that arrogance is not earned.

 

Oh, no...

 

Unclear on the concept.

 

Wait, what? What did I miss?

 

Perhaps he's been kidnapped by MS-13.

 

Many States already have laws that impose criminal and civil penalties for not preventing a minor to access your guns.

California has a good law. Child Access Prevention in California | Giffords Law Center to Prevent Gun Violence

It seems logical that you would reduce school deaths if you had laws that mandated you could not own or have unfettered access to a firearm until you were age 21.

 

So there were two trained resource officers at Santa Fe who exchanged gunfire with the kid?

No wonder the narrative has changed from "give teachers pistols" to "damn these video games and Ritalin!"

 

Some of the weirdos here on this board think their idiotic talking points aren't absurd. People on the outside see it for what it is.