1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Willie Taggart refuses to take questions from Oregonian reporter

Discussion in 'Journalism topics only' started by Alma, Feb 23, 2017.

  1. Doc Holliday

    Doc Holliday Well-Known Member

    When you've covered a D-I college beat for 21 years, you might look at things differently. When I was a young pissant trying to prove I knew it all, yeah, I might have written that same fucking sentence. Years of experience has taught me to observe, then write. Not write, then observe.
     
  2. Ace

    Ace Well-Known Member

    I don't really think they are very negative terms for college football workouts. But it would always be better to give specifics than characterize them.
     
  3. Doc Holliday

    Doc Holliday Well-Known Member

    They're not too terribly negative to me either. But, I kinda feel that when those words are used with the subject matter (exhausted athletes collapsing or being sent to the hospital) they have a much greater impact. A wise editor once told me "Choose your words carefully."

    Years ago, I would have ignored that line of thinking and sensationalized it. But now, I'd report less from the reactionary side and go more from the wait-and-see side. That's how reporters stay in the middle and out of hot water. They don't inject their own personal beliefs or opinions into a story. And, this guy did that without even witnessing any of it. That's shoddy reporting in my book.
     
  4. studthug12

    studthug12 Active Member

    As someone stated earlier I don't think saying grueling was the error. Not really stating what made the workouts grueling was the error, but as @Doc Holliday said you either had to be there or ask for examples to back up the term. As far as errors go, however, pretty minor, not stabbed in the heart statement worthy.
     
  5. Alma

    Alma Well-Known Member

    To use the word grueling? Maybe you would have had to seen the workout, but descriptions of it lend to the idea of it being...grueling.

    I feel like your definition of the job is just a lot closer to transcription than anything else.
     
  6. Doc Holliday

    Doc Holliday Well-Known Member

    There's nothing wrong with creativity. There are times to use it and there are times to stick with the facts. This was one of those times that sticking with facts was the wiser choice.

    Again, when I was younger and trying to prove I knew it all and be a pissant while doing it, I probably would have written the same sentence and not thought twice about it. The wiser, more experienced version of me, knows better.
     
  7. Alma

    Alma Well-Known Member

    Grueling is not being a pissant. "Humiliating" would be. Grueling is close enough to strenuous, which is the baseline definition for a football workout.
     
  8. Doc Holliday

    Doc Holliday Well-Known Member

    Fair enough. You've made a good point. I'll concede on grueling. I still think he should have witnessed the whole thing first hand if he wanted to get cute with it.
     
  9. dixiehack

    dixiehack Well-Known Member

Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page