1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Use Tape Recorder...Yes or No

Discussion in 'Journalism topics only' started by BNWriter, Aug 3, 2011.

?

I use a tape recorder or other recording device for interviews

  1. Yes, sometimes

    16 vote(s)
    20.0%
  2. Yes, all the time

    49 vote(s)
    61.3%
  3. Yes, tape recorder some; another mode others

    2 vote(s)
    2.5%
  4. No

    4 vote(s)
    5.0%
  5. Another device used (Specify)

    9 vote(s)
    11.3%
  1. Football_Bat

    Football_Bat Well-Known Member

    Especially when you're talking to kids, sometimes they'll freeze up when they see a tape recorder. So I just take a notepad and hide the recorder underneath it.
     
  2. jr/shotglass

    jr/shotglass Well-Known Member

    That's not a hangup. You're right.
     
  3. spikechiquet

    spikechiquet Well-Known Member

    In this day and age if a kid 'freezes' in front of a recorder...instead of hiding it, explain briefly that this helps make sure you get them quoted right. I think they are tech-savvy enough to understand it helps your job.
     
  4. Hoos3725

    Hoos3725 Member

    I disagree with this one. If you're just looking for quotes to fill out your story, that can take 2 minutes. But if you're asking questions and trying to learn something you didn't know before the interview started, that can take longer than two minutes.

    I use a recorder except for when I'm on deadline. I just can't find my quotes fast enough and type them fast enough if they're on my recorder. Maybe that makes me slow.
     
  5. Some Guy

    Some Guy Active Member

    I don't think the point is kids have never seen a tape recorder before. I think it's more that it reminds them that omyfuckinggodi'mbeinginterviewedforthenewspaper.
     
  6. jr/shotglass

    jr/shotglass Well-Known Member

    Well, if they use 46-letter words like omyfuckinggodi'mbeinginterviewedforthenewspaper, you probably don't want to quote them verbatim, either.
     
  7. flexmaster33

    flexmaster33 Well-Known Member

    I agree, it shouldn't take more than two minutes to get what you need for a game...I typically pull a kid or two aside try to get a quote from each, then grab the coach for each side before they hit the locker room, then I'm back to the office and cranking the story out.

    If deadline's not an issue, then hang out for a bit and do longer interviews when the team comes out of the locker room, or show up at practice.
     
  8. sprtswrtr10

    sprtswrtr10 Member

    I'm with the school that says it doesn't have to be verbatim if verbatim is distracting to read and only serves to confuse what it is the coach or player is trying to say. That said, I don't think you can put words in anybody's mouth. But I think you can delete excessive superfluous words. Here's a small example. "You know" "Like" "I mean." Some subjects use these conventions excessively. You just don't need all of that. Sometimes, a "You know" will make it more clear the way the subject was coming across. It could denote the tone of the quote. Then it's valuable. But if it's just a nervous habit the subject can't break, who needs it? I've been doing this for more than 20 years and I've never had anybody challenge me on a quote. Ever. That's good enough for me.
     
  9. Some Guy

    Some Guy Active Member

    A little bit of a threadjack, but ...

    While I'll admit there are certain instances in which deadline issues force you to use the first canned quote you can find, in general, if your interviews are only taking two minutes apiece, you're doing it wrong.
     
  10. Versatile

    Versatile Active Member

    If you're writing 400 words on a high school soccer game on deadline, you do what you need to. If you're writing 800 words on an NFL game, you take a little more time even if it means filing a no-quotes version.
     
  11. Cosmo

    Cosmo Well-Known Member

    I don't transcribe full interviews any more. Even for features. There's no point. I know where the crucial quotes are. Total waste of time.
     
  12. ColdCat

    ColdCat Well-Known Member

    covering a high school football scrimmage this weekend I walk up to the coach and the first words out of his mouth are, "I like that you use a recorder." to him it wasn't so much that he knew the quote would be accurate, it was that he knew he wouldn't have to wait for two minutes after every question while I wrote stuff down. I've done a few interviews without the recorder, usually phoners while I was typing and talking to the person, and it alters the way I conduct the interview. I end up truncating a longer quote just so I won't have dead air over the phone.
    and if you're worried about transcribing a long interview on deadline, try asking all game-specific stuff in the first few minutes and the stuff you'll use for notebooks and features later on.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page