1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

LA parents upset at self-described pedophile's blog

Discussion in 'Anything goes' started by Perry White, Jul 28, 2007.

  1. Perry White

    Perry White Active Member

    Scary stuff, here: http://www.nytimes.com/2007/07/28/us/28pedophile.html?ref=us&pagewanted=all


     
  2. CentralIllinoisan

    CentralIllinoisan Active Member

    That is disturbing, as is the ad on this page: "Fun Quiz for Fun Moms"
     
  3. TyWebb

    TyWebb Well-Known Member

    It's surprising he doesn't get his ass kicked more. He deserves a beating everytime he goes "trolling."

    And what is that shit about his income? I'm assuming its either unemployment or welfare, which speaks a lot about those two services.
     
  4. Lester Bangs

    Lester Bangs Active Member

    It will be a damn shame when somebody kills this guy and the cops have better things to do than attempt to solve the case.
     
  5. markvid

    markvid Guest

    I don't mind the fact that he's now revealed where and when to find him.
     
  6. heyabbott

    heyabbott Well-Known Member

    Thank god and the ACLU we live in a country where pedophiles can live openly and actively, without government restriction or hindrance, and write openly of his desires and his stalking ability. If a few little children get raped or molested or even killed along the way, well, it's the price for freedom.
     
  7. Lester Bangs

    Lester Bangs Active Member

    WTF are you talking about?
     
  8. shotglass

    shotglass Guest

    It was a particularly well-done piece of sarcasm, Lester.
     
  9. TyWebb

    TyWebb Well-Known Member

    But it did lack the standard blue font.
     
  10. Unibomber

    Unibomber Member

    Given I am in a sour mood (see my recent topic post amd find out why), I just say this group should find him and make sure (wink-wink) he decides to leave town. Or, better yet, perhaps this group could ensure that his suffers a horrible "accident" and dies.
     
  11. Lester Bangs

    Lester Bangs Active Member

    Well, I got that much ... and maybe my knowledge of the ACLU is a bit thin, but when did they jump in the sack with NAMBLA?
     
  12. heyabbott

    heyabbott Well-Known Member

    The ACLU was good in the beginning, but they went too far.
    A foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of small minds.
    The fact that the ACLU can't distinguish between pedophiles and communists makes them a scary organization.

    http://www.aclu.org/freespeech/protest/11289prs20000831.html

    NEW YORK--In the United States Supreme Court over the past few years, the American Civil Liberties Union has taken the side of a fundamentalist Christian church, a Santerian church, and the International Society for Krishna Consciousness. In celebrated cases, the ACLU has stood up for everyone from Oliver North to the National Socialist Party. In spite of all that, the ACLU has never advocated Christianity, ritual animal sacrifice, trading arms for hostages or genocide. In representing NAMBLA today, our Massachusetts affiliate does not advocate sexual relationships between adults and children.

    What the ACLU does advocate is robust freedom of speech for everyone. The lawsuit involved here, were it to succeed, would strike at the heart of freedom of speech. The case is based on a shocking murder. But the lawsuit says the crime is the responsibility not of those who committed the murder, but of someone who posted vile material on the Internet. The principle is as simple as it is central to true freedom of speech: those who do wrong are responsible for what they do; those who speak about it are not.

    It is easy to defend freedom of speech when the message is something many people find at least reasonable. But the defense of freedom of speech is most critical when the message is one most people find repulsive. That was true when the Nazis marched in Skokie. It remains true today.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page