1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

US Army sergeant held for civilian shootings in Afghanistan.

Discussion in 'Sports and News' started by Azrael, Mar 11, 2012.

  1. Boom_70

    Boom_70 Well-Known Member

    And who agreed?

    http://www.nypost.com/p/news/international/obama_sending_more_troops_to_afghanistan_4Zip6gld4A2W7Ziuod71YN

    Given the current state of affairs in Afghanistan,it's fair to say that Obama's decision to send 30,000 more troops to Afghanistan in 2010 has been an abject failure.

    It's telltale that the top 3 Generals who were proponents of the surge are now no longer involved with the operation. General McKiernan and General McCrystall were both relieved of their commands and General Petraeus moved to CIA.
     
  2. Azrael

    Azrael Well-Known Member

    The Pentagon sold the surge to Bush and then sold it to Obama. If the President had ignored them, the right would be howling that we'd cut and run. C'mon.
     
  3. Boom_70

    Boom_70 Well-Known Member

    You c'mon. Bush was out of office a full year before Obama made the decision to send more troops. The right was not pushing for more troops.
     
  4. Azrael

    Azrael Well-Known Member

    Seriously?

    www.pittsburghlive.com/x/pittsburghtrib/news/s_646768.html?source=rss&feed=7
     
  5. Baron Scicluna

    Baron Scicluna Well-Known Member

    McCain was on Meet the Press yesterday. He was bitching that Obama "wasn't showing leadership" by sending "only" 30,000 troops in the surge instead of 40,000.
     
  6. Boom_70

    Boom_70 Well-Known Member

    Essentially what you are saying was that Obama needed to send more troops to avoid criticism from the right.
    What kind of leadership is that?
     
  7. deskslave

    deskslave Active Member

    Are you kidding me? There's not a problem anywhere in the world that the right doesn't think can be solved with troops, troops and more troops.

    And stop questioning the president's decisions in the prosecution of war. As Dick Cheney told me repeatedly, it's treasonous.
     
  8. Azrael

    Azrael Well-Known Member

    No. That's not what I'm saying at all.

    What I'm saying is that the president took the best advice of his generals and acted upon it.

    A decision with which the American right agreed wholeheartedly at the time.
     
  9. Boom_70

    Boom_70 Well-Known Member

    I'm part of the "American right" and I did not wholeheartedly agree. There were plenty of others
    also.

    Even Obama's VP spoke out against the surge.
     
  10. YankeeFan

    YankeeFan Well-Known Member

    Can we please stop citing political opposition by the other party as a reason fo doing, or not doing, something?

    Do yo really think Obama cares what "the right" thinks about any of his positions? He's shown repeatedly that he doesn't.

    I'd also like to think that President Obama doesn't decide troop deployment levels based on politics.
     
  11. Azrael

    Azrael Well-Known Member

  12. Azrael

    Azrael Well-Known Member

    He took the advice of his generals. A Republican congress agreed with that advice.
     
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page