Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
Did you miss your
activation email?
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Login with username, password and session length
News
: Follow us on Twitter:
Click here.
Home
Rules
Help
Search
Login
Register
SportsJournalists.com
>
Journalism
>
Journalism topics only
>
Design Discussion
(Moderators:
playthrough
,
Elliotte Friedman
) > Topic:
Dumb quark question
Pages: [
1
]
2
Go Down
« previous
next »
Print
Author
Topic: Dumb quark question (Read 4433 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Angola!
Guest
Dumb quark question
«
on:
July 28, 2008, 01:55:13 PM »
It's been a long while since I laid out pages, yet I'm doing that again.
I've been doing the baseball page recently and for some reason they don't use quick keys here.
I can't remember how to set them up, help please.
Logged
Gomer
Jr. Member
Offline
Posts: 1,563
Re: Dumb quark question
«
Reply #1 on:
July 28, 2008, 02:31:56 PM »
In older versions of Quark there's no setting them up. You either know them or you don't know them.
http://www.keyxl.com/aaadcb0/104/Quark-Express-quark-xpress-software-keyboard-shortcuts.htm
In new versions go to System Preferences>Keyboard and Mouse>Keyboard Shortcuts
Oh, crap, I just realized you're looking to set up shortcuts for your styles. To do that go to Edit>Style sheets and you can make shortcuts within the styles. Best bet to use number pad keys.
Logged
Angola!
Guest
Re: Dumb quark question
«
Reply #2 on:
July 28, 2008, 03:58:36 PM »
thanks. i'll try that. i always have used the f keys in the past.
Logged
forever_town
Full Member
Offline
Posts: 12,395
I may be old, but I rock.
Re: Dumb quark question
«
Reply #3 on:
July 28, 2008, 08:59:42 PM »
I don't even think I use quick keys that much. Then again, I'm using Quark 4.
We have Quark 7, but many of our Macs are still running System 9. Thus, we're still using Quark 4.
Are you using a PC or a Mac to design pages?
Logged
Sic semper tyrannis.
"We love you F_T." -- Ace
"You don't need them, F_T. Just prove them wrong. Make it a mission." -- mike311gd
"Family isn't determined just by blood but by the relationships we build over time." -- OOP
Angola!
Guest
Re: Dumb quark question
«
Reply #4 on:
July 29, 2008, 10:08:12 AM »
Quote from: forever_town on July 28, 2008, 08:59:42 PM
I don't even think I use quick keys that much. Then again, I'm using Quark 4.
We have Quark 7, but many of our Macs are still running System 9. Thus, we're still using Quark 4.
Are you using a PC or a Mac to design pages?
Using a Mac. It is OS-10 as well. I'm not sure which version of Quark it is.
Logged
jps
Jr. Member
Offline
Posts: 2,676
the Irish won a bowl game ... anything is possible
Re: Dumb quark question
«
Reply #5 on:
July 29, 2008, 03:15:51 PM »
sorry, gola ... running InDesign here. And only have a little experience in Quark ...
I suggest, though, spending 15 or 20 bucks and buying the "for dummies" book for quark ... got one initially for InDesign and have come back to it multiple times as a reference guide.
Logged
my thinking is indicative of the stultified, deadly minds that are destroying American news organizations. just ask john temple. he's all a twitter.
bush should have written "iraq has wmds" in a softball score book and presented it at a press conference. that would have settled everything. -- meat
Rosie
Jr. Member
Offline
Posts: 4,205
I'm only back on a trial basis.
Re: Dumb quark question
«
Reply #6 on:
July 31, 2008, 04:33:38 PM »
Quote from: forever_town on July 28, 2008, 08:59:42 PM
I don't even think I use quick keys that much. Then again, I'm using Quark 4.
We have Quark 7, but many of our Macs are still running System 9. Thus, we're still using Quark 4.
Are you using a PC or a Mac to design pages?
You mean my paper isn't the last paper using OS 9 and Quark 4?
I'm speechless.
Logged
sj.com's own Queen of the Northwoods
It'd be great for a while, till they impeach me. -- Mr. Rosie, when asked if he'd ever want the Presidency.
All we have to do is come up with something to change the balance of power in the Universe by noon tomorrow.
FIRE CHILDRESS NOW!!!
Gomer
Jr. Member
Offline
Posts: 1,563
Re: Dumb quark question
«
Reply #7 on:
July 31, 2008, 04:51:32 PM »
Rosie, my shop is in the same ship. Actually, we're running OS 9 (Classic) INSIDE OS X, just so we can run Quark 4. They're looking to go Quark 7 sometime, which means around 2015.
Logged
Colton
SJ Subscriber
Jr. Member
Offline
Posts: 1,559
You guys playin' cards?
Re: Dumb quark question
«
Reply #8 on:
August 02, 2008, 05:48:25 PM »
Ugh.. Quark 4 here, too.
And, Gomer, 2015 would probably be optimistic for an upgrade in my neck of the woods.
Logged
We're gonna need a bigger boat
Cut me, Mick!
Definition of a wolverine: A badger with VD
SportsDude
Jr. Member
Offline
Posts: 1,199
Santa Chizzle is coming to town!
Re: Dumb quark question
«
Reply #9 on:
August 02, 2008, 06:06:31 PM »
Quote from: Gomer on July 31, 2008, 04:51:32 PM
Rosie, my shop is in the same ship. Actually, we're running OS 9 (Classic) INSIDE OS X, just so we can run Quark 4. They're looking to go Quark 7 sometime, which means around 2015.
We had Quark 4 with OS 9 until last fall, when our computers began failing so much they had no choice to do the switch. We went to new Mini Macs with CS3 suite. Like hauling Big Foot with a wheel barrel.
Logged
Gomer
Jr. Member
Offline
Posts: 1,563
Re: Dumb quark question
«
Reply #10 on:
August 03, 2008, 08:05:25 PM »
Ugh. Our reporters get minis, but layout people get G4's or G5's here. Problem is that we're still using NewsEdit Pro and will have to upgrade that when/if we switch over to full OSX structure. From what I can tell it adds quite a bit on to the cost. But it is coming.
Logged
Colton
SJ Subscriber
Jr. Member
Offline
Posts: 1,559
You guys playin' cards?
Re: Dumb quark question
«
Reply #11 on:
August 05, 2008, 05:44:02 AM »
Gomer: We are using NewsEdit Pro here, too...
Logged
We're gonna need a bigger boat
Cut me, Mick!
Definition of a wolverine: A badger with VD
Rosie
Jr. Member
Offline
Posts: 4,205
I'm only back on a trial basis.
Re: Dumb quark question
«
Reply #12 on:
August 06, 2008, 05:10:57 PM »
NewsEdit Pro here as well.
Logged
sj.com's own Queen of the Northwoods
It'd be great for a while, till they impeach me. -- Mr. Rosie, when asked if he'd ever want the Presidency.
All we have to do is come up with something to change the balance of power in the Universe by noon tomorrow.
FIRE CHILDRESS NOW!!!
a_rosenthal
Guest
Re: Dumb quark question
«
Reply #13 on:
August 06, 2008, 10:49:47 PM »
Got you guys beat.
I've got ID CS3 on my machine, as do all of the designers. We're running ID version 2.02. Not CS2. But 2.02.
Oh, and I fucking love NewsEdit. Much better than DTI.
Logged
Gomer
Jr. Member
Offline
Posts: 1,563
Re: Dumb quark question
«
Reply #14 on:
August 06, 2008, 11:04:02 PM »
I'd still take that over Quark 4.1. At least you're not dealing with all the system crashes that come with running OS9 in an OSX environment.
Logged
Tom Petty
Guest
Re: Dumb quark question
«
Reply #15 on:
August 06, 2008, 11:23:56 PM »
the desk folks don't use quick keys at your shop? they must be a bunch of fucking idiots.
edit: gomer, you are a gomer.
«
Last Edit: August 07, 2008, 01:19:23 AM by Tom Petty
»
Logged
Gomer
Jr. Member
Offline
Posts: 1,563
Re: Dumb quark question
«
Reply #16 on:
August 06, 2008, 11:38:56 PM »
Please tell me you're typing in blue font. Indesign CS2 or CS3 is as good, if not better than any version of Quark, depending on who you ask.
Logged
Tom Petty
Guest
Re: Dumb quark question
«
Reply #17 on:
August 06, 2008, 11:46:06 PM »
Quote from: Gomer on August 06, 2008, 11:38:56 PM
Please tell me you're typing in blue font. Indesign CS2 or CS3 is as good, if not better than any version of Quark, depending on who you ask.
you can count how many months it's been since you graduated college, can't you?
Logged
Gomer
Jr. Member
Offline
Posts: 1,563
Re: Dumb quark question
«
Reply #18 on:
August 07, 2008, 12:16:49 AM »
Yeah. Off the top of my head, 96.
You're entitled to your opinion but you come off as a jackass with comments like that.
Logged
Tom Petty
Guest
Re: Dumb quark question
«
Reply #19 on:
August 07, 2008, 12:18:50 AM »
Quote from: Gomer on August 07, 2008, 12:16:49 AM
Yeah. Off the top of my head, 96.
You're entitled to your opinion but you come off as a jackass with comments like that.
and you love indesign. only people i've ever heard preach the love of ID, are new grads and, well, gomers.
Logged
a_rosenthal
Guest
Re: Dumb quark question
«
Reply #20 on:
August 07, 2008, 12:24:02 AM »
I like them both. I probably prefer ID right now, but that's because it's been a while since I used Quark.
Though, isn't saying something like "everyone who likes ______ is of ______ demographic" kind of, ohgoshidon'tknow, a bit silly?
Logged
Tom Petty
Guest
Re: Dumb quark question
«
Reply #21 on:
August 07, 2008, 12:27:06 AM »
Quote from: a_rosenthal on August 07, 2008, 12:24:02 AM
I like them both. I probably prefer ID right now, but that's because it's been a while since I used Quark.
Though, isn't saying something like "everyone who likes ______ is of ______ demographic" kind of, ohgoshidon'tknow, a bit silly?
rosen - reread my last post. not what i said.
Logged
Gomer
Jr. Member
Offline
Posts: 1,563
Re: Dumb quark question
«
Reply #22 on:
August 07, 2008, 12:52:17 AM »
You implied that anyone who uses Indesign is an idiot. I think you were pretty clear on that.
For the record, I never said I loved Indesign. I simply pointed out that, depending on who you ask, Indesign's latest versions are better than Quark. I've talked to some who like it better, some who don't.
I don't have enough experience with Indesign to say whether it is better on a regular desking environment, but I do think it's better for feature layout due to its seamless integration with Illustrator and Photoshop.
But feel free to continue calling people names anyhow. It seems to be your shtick.
Logged
Tom Petty
Guest
Re: Dumb quark question
«
Reply #23 on:
August 07, 2008, 12:57:38 AM »
Quote from: Gomer on August 07, 2008, 12:52:17 AM
You implied that anyone who uses Indesign is an idiot. I think you were pretty clear on that.
For the record, I never said I loved Indesign. I simply pointed out that, depending on who you ask, Indesign's latest versions are better than Quark. I've talked to some who like it better, some who don't.
I don't have enough experience with Indesign to say whether it is better on a regular desking environment, but I do think it's better for feature layout due to its seamless integration with Illustrator and Photoshop.
But feel free to continue calling people names anyhow. It seems to be your shtick.
jesus christ, gomer, it's schtick. and take just a minute out of your fucking day to read post no. 19.
Logged
Gomer
Jr. Member
Offline
Posts: 1,563
Re: Dumb quark question
«
Reply #24 on:
August 07, 2008, 01:06:16 AM »
Incidentally, it's both. I had schtick but Firefox's spellchecker corrected it to shtick on me.
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/shtick
It's pretty pathetic that someone who doesn't use capital letters would go out of their way to proofread what I'm posting.
Quote from: Tom Petty on August 06, 2008, 11:23:56 PM
the desk folks don't use quark at your shop? they must be a bunch of fucking idiots.
And that post is the one that insinuates that those who use Indesign are idiots. I already addressed you alleging I 'love' Indesign.
Logged
Pages: [
1
]
2
Go Up
Print
SportsJournalists.com
>
Journalism
>
Journalism topics only
>
Design Discussion
(Moderators:
playthrough
,
Elliotte Friedman
) > Topic:
Dumb quark question
« previous
next »
Jump to:
Please select a destination:
-----------------------------
SportsJournalists.com
-----------------------------
=> Announcements
-----------------------------
Journalism
-----------------------------
=> Journalism topics only
===> Writers' Workshop
===> Design Discussion
=> Jobs
===> Freelance/stringer help available
===> Freelance/stringer help wanted
-----------------------------
Everything else
-----------------------------
=> Sports and News
===> Politics
=> Anything goes
Loading...