1. Welcome to SportsJournalists.com, a friendly forum for discussing all things sports and journalism.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register for a free account to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Access to private conversations with other members.
    • Fewer ads.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Gambling & Journalism

Discussion in 'Journalism topics only' started by Lugnuts, Nov 5, 2019.

  1. Inky_Wretch

    Inky_Wretch Well-Known Member

    When Nolan Richardson held his final fiery press conference at Arkansas, he alluded to a local newspaper reporter who covered the Razorbacks getting caught gambling on the Hogs. Nolan allegedly found out about it when the reporter started asking players if they thought they'd win by X points the day before the game. X always equaled the current point spread.

    I forget the exact wording (I wish I'd saved the transcript too), but Nolan mentioned a college athlete who was kicked off the team for betting on sports and then pointed out the reporter was still on the UA beat after getting caught gambling on the team he was covering.

    Naturally, the state's media glossed over that part of the press conference. It was never discussed again.
     
  2. Bubbler

    Bubbler Well-Known Member

    I listened to VSIN for the first time today. It is very good radio and because the lines are about the games, they actually talk about the games. A novel concept. I learned more on my three-hour drive today than I have in years from any sports radio show.

    I do find some of the deep betting info hilarious though. Stuff like the TNF dog has beat the spread for five weeks straight. I don’t know how anyone can take a stat like that seriously. It’s completely a product of small sample size plus random chance.

    However, there are tidbits in there that a smart person should pick up on. Never occurred to me until they mentioned it the value of assessing back-to-backs as far as NBA betting is concerned. If I were a NBA bettor, I think I’d exclusively bet against teams on the back end of a back-to-back unless it was Nuggets-Knicks or something.

    But the best part about VSIN are the Musberger radio spots. Hawking male genital grooming products and one where he mentioned “no spooning with the wife tonight” were worth the price of admission.
     
  3. Bubbler

    Bubbler Well-Known Member

    It’s definitely an ethical concern, the insider trading aspect you mentioned in another post is legit, but there’s a more mundane concern too.

    If you’re sweating out a wager, you’re easily distracted while doing your job. It’s not professional in that sense any more than it’s professional to get distracted by anything else that takes away from your focus.
     
    Azrael likes this.
  4. poindexter

    poindexter Well-Known Member

    You aren't exactly discovering the wheel there. The oddsmakers know this as well, and the back-to-back factor is baked into the line.

    But your overall point is a great one. I have listened to RJ Bell's gambling podcasts for close to a decade, and the sports betting radio/pod is better than sports radio, because they talk about the games; not leBron vs. Jordan debates, or whether Pete Rose should be in the Hall of Fame.
     
  5. Bubbler

    Bubbler Well-Known Member

    Oh I figured. I'm not discovering anything at all.

    But I think the vast majority of the public is like me, a gambling novice who never thought the angles through, but unlike (legal) sports gambling for time immemorial? There's going to be far more novices in the market than ever before as more states go legal and as mobile gambling gains hegemony. It will be interesting to see how that influx of non-smart money affects things.
     
  6. HanSenSE

    HanSenSE Well-Known Member

    Since this topic was bumped ....
    In their glory days in the 80s and 90s, word was not to trust the Reno line on the 49ers because some were going to bet them no matter what. Is there that much uneducated money in Vegas on the three closest teams (Raiders, Rams, Chargers)?
     
  7. playthrough

    playthrough Moderator Staff Member

    There absolutely was on the Golden Knights their first year, and of course the bettors unexpectedly cleaned up. I remember listening to VSiN that year and the bookies could only shake their head, but knew in the long run they'd be OK because their hockey handle would never be small again. For the NFL, I'd say there's so much money in the markets that it's unlikely that odds on the Raiders/LA teams games would be compromised. Maybe the odds on the Raiders futures book is skewed by the locals.
     
    HanSenSE likes this.
  8. Readallover

    Readallover Active Member

  9. LanceyHoward

    LanceyHoward Well-Known Member

    The column makes the point that Le Batard left terrestrial radio and is now making a hughe amount of money for podcasting. Pat McAfee also signed a big deal for his podcast (was he ever on radio)? And Simmons nine figures with his podcast network.

    What does this mean for sports talk radio. Will it disappear? Will toe local market stars go to podcasting?
     
  10. AD

    AD Active Member

    Neutral Corner likes this.
  11. playthrough

    playthrough Moderator Staff Member

    That is really good. I didn't know the Harlan story.

    I'm not sure that the first scandals in this era will be what most might expect like crooked refs or a point guard on the take. It's gonna be some fan at a golf tournament that barks in the backswing of a rookie trying to win for the first time, causing the rookie to crumble and the chalk to come in, and not just because the fan wants to hear himself on TV.
     
    Last edited: May 12, 2021
    Fdufta likes this.
  12. exmediahack

    exmediahack Well-Known Member

    We're just seeing HOW much money is to be made -- mostly by the books and by the "celebrity" analysts/hosts/endorsers these sportsbooks are hiring. It's also the primary reason to watch live sports unless it's a premium matchup or you're simply a fan of a particular franchise or team.

    DraftKings and FanDuel have so much money. It's a perfect business plan. They give anyone $500 to $1,500 to sign-up and start betting and, unlike Nevada/Jersey casinos, they don't have any union dealers, cooks, chefs, janitorial staff, housekeeping, pit bosses, etc. Casinos don't make a lot of money off sports betting, compared to penny slots. But if ALL you do is sports betting and have no overhead, you are printing stacks and stacks of cash.

    90% of the bettors really don't have any idea what they're doing. DraftKings will match their $500 deposit with another $500, for example, and they'll blow the entire $1,000 within a month.

    I got "legal" in 2019 on sports betting and I took my lumps early but I was never down more than $300. Then I realized the only way to profit, for me, is to use the promos/free bets that I receive every day and just cash those in. It's simple math. If you get a +175 bet on one side and -150 on the other, you'll profit, regardless of the outcome.

    I'm up about 22k in the last year just doing this. It CAN be done but it requires some serious discipline. About $400 a week -- $60 a day average, a little more on weekends.

    The shift was once I quit trying to predict the outcomes of games and, simply, looked to exploit "bad lines", the game got easy. (I play soccer totals for the most part.)
     
    playthrough likes this.
Draft saved Draft deleted

Share This Page